This is a review of Schwartz's book that wasn't written by a complete moron.
'Sudden Origins : Fossils, Genes, and the Emergence of Species' by Jeffrey H. SchwartzNew species develop more quickly than is widely believed, Pitt anthropologist says
Sunday, December 12, 1999
By Fred Bortz
Sudden Origins : Fossils, Genes, and the Emergence of Species
By Jeffrey H. Schwartz
John Wiley $27.95
Jeffrey Schwartz, a University of Pittsburgh anthropology professor, has written a book that will challenge -- even overwhelm -- its readers with a wealth of detail. Yet if they can stay the course, they will be rewarded with a thought-provoking new view of the history of life.
“Evolution is not a theory,” argues Schwartz. “It is a phenomenon. What evolutionists … strive to understand are the processes that make evolution tick. This is not an easy task, because evolutionary events occur over greater periods of time than any scientist, or generations of scientists, could observe.”
Without taking on so-called “creation science” directly, Schwartz demonstrates that evolutionary theory is itself evolving, as all good scientific theories do in the face of new knowledge. What creation scientists cite as the theory’s weaknesses, Schwartz presents as its strengths.
With a thorough detailing of the history of this century-and-a-half-long quest, even including notations in Darwin’s original notebooks, he traces the development of our current understanding.
That understanding emerges not as Darwinian doctrine, but rather as the result of a rich scientific conversation among colleagues and adversaries, all of whom are seeking to understand the origin and development of, and relationships among, the diverse creatures that have lived on our planet.
A recurring theme in that conversation is one that creation scientists often seize upon. If life evolves gradually, where are all the “missing links”? Although that term conjures images of “ape-men,” the challenge to the theory is much more serious than that. The fossil record is riddled with gaps.
Life forms evolve, it seems, in a kind of punctuated equilibrium. Successful species change slowly and gradually over millions of years, then new species originate suddenly, arising in dramatically different forms with, in many cases, no intermediate examples.
There are two general theories to explain this absence of transitional creatures. One group has insisted that the intermediate examples will be found; the other has argued that geographic separation and environmental change drive rapid development of new species.
Schwartz sides with the latter group and tackles two important unanswered questions in his “New Evolution” as to the underlying cause of novel characteristics that lead quickly to new species: “How will novelty look when it does appear?” and “how does more than one individual come to have a novel structure?”
The answer, he writes, lies in a class of genes called homeobox, whose importance was not fully appreciated until recently. These genes regulate the development of creatures from embryo through adult.
Mutations in these genes propagate invisibly through the species as recessive and unexpressed, says Schwartz, until they are common enough that some individuals inherit them from both parents. That leads to fully developed novel features. Within a few generations, a new species emerges.
To Schwartz, this is the origin of species: “The same kinds of structural building blocks are found among a wildly diverse array of organisms -- from yeasts to humans -- that have fashioned the resultant structures differently,” thanks mainly to the differences between their developmental sequence. As a result, “seemingly distantly related and very dissimilar groups we call invertebrates and vertebrates are, in their genes, much closer than scientists even ten years ago could have imagined.”
One developmental sequence leads to animals with skeletons inside their musculature; another leads to the opposite arrangement.
“Given the potential of homeobox genes to be fully rather than partially expressed,” Schwartz concludes, “we can appreciate why ‘missing links’ are so elusive in the fossil record. They probably did not exist.”
phenomenon - An occurrence, circumstance, or fact that is perceptible by the senses....What evolutionists … strive to understand are the processes that make evolution tick. This is not an easy task, because evolutionary events occur over greater periods of time than any scientist, or generations of scientists, could observe."
Actually, when you called Schwartz a numbskull, you were quoting Schwartz.
"Life forms evolve, it seems, in a kind of punctuated equilibrium."
When I read this article my first thought was this was just another form of "punctuated equilibrium." Therefore, it doesn't challenge the supposed "phenomena" of evolution, just Darwin's views on how it occurred.
I'm unapologetically a YEC. However, I can understand your irritation that this article is posted in such a way to imply the TOE is being challenged, not just Darwin's ideas.
An easy mistake for a not as educated in current "science" YEC to make. The poster meant well and I commend their enthusiasm). I personally have learned to live with the fact that the scientific community at large will not ever accept YEC, and strive to avoid a needless arguement that will change no minds. All this article shows is that there is disagreement amoung "naturalistics" about how evolution occurred, not that it occurred.
It will take some pretty remarkable findings to change the minds of those that hold evolution as a settled fact.