Skip to comments.
Judge considers blocking Morales execution
AP ^
| 2/10/6
| DAVID KRAVETS
Posted on 02/10/2006 7:59:12 AM PST by SmithL
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A federal judge is considering whether to block a murderer and rapist's Feb. 21 execution to provide enough time to determine whether lethal injection is unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment.
"People's confidence and integrity in the process might be assisted in having some kind of evidentiary proceeding," U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel said Thursday from the bench after an 80-minute hearing. He said he would rule by Tuesday.
Lawyers for Michael Morales asked Fogel to block the looming execution amid claims lethal injection violates the Eighth Amendment.
Morales, 46, was condemned for raping and murdering a 17-year-old Lodi girl 25 years ago.
The Stockton man has a long legal road to travel in his bid to stay alive, even if he wins a reprieve by Fogel. The U.S. Supreme Court has never endorsed a claim that lethal injection, used in 36 states, is unconstitutionally cruel, although the justices are weighing the procedure by which inmates can make such a challenge.
Morales also is asking Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to commute his sentence to life without parole, a clemency bid supported by the trial judge and six jurors who sentenced him 23 years ago.
Last year, Fogel dismissed a similar Eighth Amendment challenge by three-time murderer Donald Beardslee. Days later, Beardslee was injected at San Quentin State Prison, where California carries out its executions.
But Fogel did not afford Beardslee a so-called "evidentiary" hearing by which experts will examine medical records of past California executions and haggle in court over whether prisoners are conscious and feeling pain once a paralyzing agent begins coursing through their bloodstream.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: activistjudge; cruelandunusual; deathpenalth; michaelmorales
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Tookie Him!
1
posted on
02/10/2006 7:59:15 AM PST
by
SmithL
Fogel, Jeremy D.
- Born 1949 in San Francisco, CA
Federal Judicial Service:
U. S. District Court, Northern District of California
Nominated by William J. Clinton on September 8, 1997, to a seat vacated by Robert P. Aguilar; Confirmed by the Senate on March 16, 1998, and received commission on March 17, 1998.
Education:
Stanford University, B.A., 1971
Harvard Law School, J.D., 1974
Professional Career:
Private practice, San Jose, CA, 1974-1978
Lecturer, Human Development, California State University, 1977-1978
Law Foundation, Inc., Santa Clara County, CA Bar Association, 1978-1981
Directing attorney, Mental Health Advocacy Project, 1978-1981
Executive director, 1980-1981
Judge, Santa Clara County, CA Municipal Court, 1981-1986
Judge, Santa Clara, CA Superior Court, 1986-1998
Race or Ethnicity: White
Gender: Male
2
posted on
02/10/2006 7:59:48 AM PST
by
SmithL
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: SmithL
Nominated by William J. Clinton on September 8, 1997, to a seat vacated by Robert P. Aguilar A Carter appointee, and a real piece of work. Resigned after being convicted of disclosing a Fed wiretap.
3
posted on
02/10/2006 8:02:15 AM PST
by
martin_fierro
(I signed up in 1997 to post *this*?)
To: SmithL
Does this liberal trash crap ever end?
How many times do we revisit the same thing?
What I suspect is really happening is that he is looking for a way to frame the argument/ruling so as to make the death penalty cruel and unusual punishment, period.
4
posted on
02/10/2006 8:02:50 AM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: SmithL
He's right. Lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment. Let's change the method to hanging instead. Or the guillotine. Ooo, I know, drawing and quartering! Now that's humane!
5
posted on
02/10/2006 8:04:17 AM PST
by
Cyclopean Squid
(Moderates do not make history)
To: 2Fro; all_mighty_dollar; Arkat Kingtroll; Battle Hymn of the Republic; Betis70; billycat95130; ...
6
posted on
02/10/2006 8:05:45 AM PST
by
martin_fierro
(I signed up in 1997 to post *this*?)
To: SmithL
Nominated by William J. ClintonSo could it be that this clown,as well as The Most Ethical President In History,doesn't know the meaning of the word "is".
To: Bubbatuck
Pssst!
I posted another photo of another public figure who has a face.
You may want to investigate.
8
posted on
02/10/2006 8:09:52 AM PST
by
martin_fierro
(I signed up in 1997 to post *this*?)
To: SmithL
OK then, hang him since that was always the prefered method by those who gave us the Constitution :-)
9
posted on
02/10/2006 8:11:20 AM PST
by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: Former Military Chick
Yet another. *sigh*
Not like his victim got to have a peaceful, painless death. Oh wait, an ouchie from the needle going in.
10
posted on
02/10/2006 8:12:32 AM PST
by
Titan Magroyne
(Suicide Bomb Instructor: "Now pay attention, I'm only gonna do this once...")
Lethal Injection cruel and unusual punishment huh?
OK.... Hang him, shoot him, give him 'the chair' or 'the chamber'.
Personally, I think Lethal Injection is too good for such people...(its what I'd pick if I were sentenced to execution.... pretty easy way to go.)
To: SmithL
commute his sentence to life without parole, a clemency bid supported by the trial judge and six jurors who sentenced him 23 years ago. I wonder why.
12
posted on
02/10/2006 8:14:49 AM PST
by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: SmithL
13
posted on
02/10/2006 8:15:27 AM PST
by
Unicorn
(Too many wimps around.)
To: SmithL
So rape and murder is not cruel and unusual?
14
posted on
02/10/2006 8:17:17 AM PST
by
goodwithagun
(My gun has killed less people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
To: LegendHasIt
I'm really beginning to lean towards *an eye fo an eye*. They should get what they dished out. If they didn't have any qualms about doing it to someone else, they should be willing to accept the same.
15
posted on
02/10/2006 8:17:46 AM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: LegendHasIt
Death by 90 story drop........totally painless
16
posted on
02/10/2006 8:18:42 AM PST
by
joe fonebone
(Woodstock defined the current crop of libs, but who cleaned up the mess they left?)
To: MillerCreek; wagglebee
17
posted on
02/10/2006 8:19:09 AM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: LegendHasIt
If lethal injection is cruel and unusual, how can it be legal for doctors to use it for "assisted suicide" in Oregon?
To: SmithL
judge and six jurors sentenced him 23 years agoWhat's the rush?
19
posted on
02/10/2006 8:38:39 AM PST
by
layman
(Card Carrying Infidel)
To: SmithL
haggle in court over whether prisoners are conscious and feeling pain once a paralyzing agent begins coursing through their bloodstream
And what about the pain that the victim suffered at the hands of this scumbag !!! No thought for that..is there.
20
posted on
02/10/2006 8:39:47 AM PST
by
Ouderkirk
(Funny how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson