Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lentulusgracchus

The answer to your question was in the part of the statement you edited out.


482 posted on 02/17/2006 10:02:20 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies ]


To: durasell
You have no beef. I cited and quoted a statement you made, and commented on it.

And stop using "edit" as a weasel-word for "misquote". I quoted you accurately. Let's review:

Speaking as a former teenaged boy, I can confidently say that straight teenaged boys don't question their sexuality. They have a lot of questions, such as the dexterity required to unhook a bra with one hand, but their sexuality isn't one of the things they question. [Emphasis supplied.]
Notice that you made your operative statement about "STRAIGHT teenaged boys DON'T QUESTION their sexuality" not once, but twice. Your point is stunningly clear, that ALL TEENAGED BOYS WHO "QUESTION" THEIR SEXUALITY ARE, IN FACT, GAY -- AND ARE THEREFORE FAIR GAME FOR GLSEN AND PEDERASTS TO CLAIM AS "OURS".

I commented on your point, after citing your central argument and shining a limelight on it, fair and square. Q.E.D.

Happy now?

And just to keep my own argument on point -- you argument was a gay argument: "all the kids we can sway, belong to us."

Kid goes to a gay indoctrination camp, comes home "questioning" or "open to experimentation", and poof! -- you've got a new gay teen. That's the whole idea.

Your turn.

503 posted on 02/21/2006 6:22:45 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson