Actually the President said he doesn't know.
SCHIEFFER: Mr. President, let's get back to economic issues. But let's shift to some other questions here.
Both of you are opposed to gay marriage. But to understand how you have come to that conclusion, I want to ask you a more basic question. Do you believe homosexuality is a choice?
BUSH: You know, Bob, I don't know. I just don't know. I do know that we have a choice to make in America and that is to treat people with tolerance and respect and dignity. It's important that we do that.
And I also know in a free society people, consenting adults can live the way they want to live.
And that's to be honored.
But as we respect someone's rights, and as we profess tolerance, we shouldn't change -- or have to change -- our basic views on the sanctity of marriage. I believe in the sanctity of marriage. I think it's very important that we protect marriage as an institution, between a man and a woman.
JMO, the Prresident isn't kowtowing to the, IMO, stormtrooper mentality within the liberal psychological community and wants other voices in the scientific community to be heard, but who are shut out by liberals and their lackeys in the MSM.
One group that doesn't get any recognition by the modern day liberal stormtroopers and is constantly berated and never intellectually engaged is NARTH.
So before you and Amelia go into your almost liberal fascist tirades towards those who disagree with you, maybe you shouldn't take in the liberal establishment, media, hollywood, propaganda kool-aid that the homosexual "lifestyle"(deathstyle) is normal.
BTW, can you show me a civilization where homosexuality is given equal status to heterosexuality has survived and thrived, you can't, and you know it.
Obviously you didn't read my post #226.
If you'll read back, you'll see that I am not "promoting the gay lifestyle" as some here have claimed, but I do believe the student in question must have had some interest in it BEFORE he attended the OPTIONAL seminar on "The New Gay Teenager".
You'll also see that I felt including that seminar and a few others were a bit questionable, but since the offered courses for next summer are available on the internet, I felt it very possible that the parents could and should have known what their child might be exposed to before they gave him permission to attend this voluntary summer program.
What part of that exactly do you disagree with?