Posted on 02/09/2006 3:43:31 PM PST by RightGeek
The Internet firms will get a chance to squirm in public on Feb. 15, the day Representative Christopher Smiths (RN.J.) invitees are to appear before his Global Human Rights subcommittee to answer questions about their operations in China. Given their public statements to date, the U.S. firms are likely to say something like this: We must comply with local laws; we think its better for Chinese citizens to be getting filtered access to the Web than none at all; and we hope for more openness in the future.
Sure to come up: the case of Shi Tao, a reporter for the Dangdai Shang Bao (Contemporary Business News) of Hunan, who forwarded, ultimately to foreign Web sites, his account of political directives to Chinese journalists forbidding the coverage of the fifteenth anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. The Paris-headquartered free-speech advocate Reporters Without Borders, citing court records, says Yahoos subsidiary fingered Shi by handing Chinese authorities the digital fingerprints of Shis e-mail. The evidence led to the journalists ten-year prison sentence last year.
-- SNIP --
Remarkable what a little suppression can do to turn a small disgruntled group into a large, angry mob. Consider the history of the religious movement Falun Gong. Unexceptional on its face, Falun Gong looks to outsiders like a cross between tai chi and Buddhism. But about seven years ago the Chinese authorities decided that, with 70 million adherents, it had become a threat to their rule. The police began a campaign to imprison and torture the sects practitioners. It made the believers into martyrs.
Now Falun Gong is the focal point for a whole dissident movement. The practice is, appropriately, a postmodern religion that operates in the digital world: It has never had significant church real estate nor run formal fundraising activities, but is driven entirely by volunteers organized over the Internet. Now expatriate members are all over the world, bombarding their homeland with e-mails, chat rooms, phone calls and faxes. Many but not all of these messages randomly list multiple proxy Web sites that can be used to slip through the Golden Shield to access news and information from the Free World. These ever-changing proxy addresses rain down on China at such a furious pace that the Internet police cant blacklist them quickly enough. Some proxy addresses last only minutes before they are obsolete, others several days. Some use encryption (of the sort used to protect charge card numbers) to thwart the censors. The amount of information going into China is staggering, says Alan Adler, a Tenafly, N.J. businessman who raises money for this hacking effort through a nonprofit outfit called Friends of Falun Gong.
UltraReach Internet Corp. and Dynamic Internet Technology are just two commercial American companies moving information back and forth through Chinas Golden Shield for Falun Gong and other news, human rights and U.S. government organizations. UltraReach is press shy, but monthly traffic statistics weve seen suggest its proxy Web sites averaged 2 million visits and 460 million hits a month in 2005.
Dynamic Internet Technology of North Carolina got its start with a pilot project for the U.S. government in 2002 and today discreetly claims on its site that it offers customized, low-cost and reliable Internet solutions under challenging circumstances. Voice of America and the New York-headquartered Human Rights In China are also DIT customers. William Xia, DITs chief executive, claims hundreds of thousands of regulars use its services daily.
But DIT and UltraReach are just the tip of the Falun Gongs hacking efforts. We never put all our eggs in one basket, says hacktivist Chen. We work from multiple places, use many different systems and technologies, and we back each other up in many different ways. Weve learned this the hard way.
--SNIP--
We need to start a campaign to demand that Intel, Google, Yahoo, Cisco, MSN and any other US technology firms in China share, with this hacker group in NY, the technical means with which those firms assited in China's censorship and in fact, they should be helping to fund this group.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.