Posted on 02/09/2006 11:55:20 AM PST by iPod Shuffle
Simple litmus test.
Islamic law puts muslims above all other people. Jews and Christians have fewer rights by law and Buddhists, Hindus, Atheists, etc. have the least rights of all.
Therefore the standard for blasphemy is whatever irritates our new muslim masters. And while muslims can actually depict Mohammed (in a positive light), we are not muslim and therefore even a postive depiction from us is wrong.
Blasphemy prosecutions conflict with free speech. The US delegation should push hard for a Right to be free from the threat of anti-blasphemy laws... but don't hold yer breath.
...are we talking blasphemy, or just blasphemy against Islam?
Well, that simplifies things!
Do ya think Annan et al will go for this move to flow shari'a law down to all UN member states?
If he did, I wonder what China would do. I know what ACLU and Ramsay Clark would want the USA to do.
Looks like Bolton was the correct guy to send to the UN.
Okay.....ONLY after all the Arab publications and broadcasts come under the SAME RESTRICTIONS for ALL RELIGIONS...
It will NEVER happen..
We should NEVER afford the bastards ANY considerations they are not willing to offer and INFORCE in return..
F'em.
Semper Fi
I believe child sacrifice (i.e. suicide bombings condoned and encouraged by parents), honor killings, beheadings, and female genital mutilation are blasphemous. Can we get those outlawed too?
Uh, I wasn't aware they had yet exited the 7th century.
Semper Fi
The United Nations is already well on its way.
So they want the U.N. to take our freedoms away? Figures...they can't win the WOT, they can't win in the war of ideas........so get the U.N. to cower to their demands. Sounds like their last shot at it.
Only if freedom of religeon is allowed in Moslem countries
Who gets to define "blasphemy"? Even Muslim clerics don't agree among themselves - let alone clerics from other religions. The only way for this resolution to have any force is to have a Caliph who rules the world under Sharia, who will define for everyone what constitutes blasphemy.
A good point. Doesn't the Roman Catholic Church have a list of books that Catholics are not supposed to read? Maybe the UN will include that too.
...and we all know how well UN demands are obeyed...
"Doesn't the Roman Catholic Church have a list of books that Catholics are not supposed to read? Maybe the UN will include that too."
I remember hearing about this list a very long time ago (it was called The Index). I don't know if it is still in existence.
I'm thinking about the ruptures that are occurring in various Protestant demoninations over Bishops who are in open homosexual relationships and over church-sanctioned gay marriage. Who will decide whether these are blasphemous?
Okay, Muslims, will do, as soon as your countries become signatories to the UN Declaration of Human Rights, which includes FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE, something which you currently do not recognize. Until then, go F yourselves.
"does this mean the islam crowd will not be allowed to use cartoons of the evil "jooooze"? or Christians? "
No, they don't consider that blaspheme!
I got news for the islamofascists: people in hell want ice water (and virgins), but they don't usually get it!
"So they want the U.N. to take our freedoms away? Figures...they can't win the WOT, they can't win in the war of ideas........so get the U.N. to cower to their demands. Sounds like their last shot at it."
Hey, they sound like democrats and the supreme court! Can't win at the polls, so they have the judiciary take our rights!
oops, I was thinking 800 years ago. my bad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.