Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rip033
SO do you think Iran would threaten to pop a nuke right in the middle of Copenhagen the first time they got referred?
8 posted on 02/09/2006 12:24:09 PM PST by .cnI redruM (a right is something that exists simultaneously among people and imposes no obligation on another.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: .cnI redruM
No.

I would expect Iran to continue to delay to continue to develop. Time is on Iran's side. They must be within 12 to 15 months to producing something. Once they develop and test a nuke weapon then it's M.A.D. (Mutual Assured Destruction)in the Middle East. But would this policy work with a hard core Islamic Fundamentalist state? M.A.D. kept the Soviets in check from committing all out aggression against the West. I'm doubtful M.A.D. can contain the Islamic Revolution that begun over 20 years ago and has continued to grow across the world and continued to destroy lives. My good instincts tells me that Iran knows that by stirring trouble up against Denmark using their religious ties with militant groups around the world they can deflect the real issue. Should Iran be allowed nuclear weapons? Time is on their side.
10 posted on 02/09/2006 1:10:11 PM PST by rip033 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson