Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If Libby knowingly disclosed information about Plame's status with the CIA, Libby would appear to have violated Title 18, United States Code, Section 793 if the information is considered "information respecting national defense." In order to establish a violation of Title 50, United States Code 421, it would be necessary to establish that Libby knew or believed that Plame was a person whose identity the CIA was making specific efforts to conceal and who has carried out cover work overseas within the last 5 years. To date, we have no direct evidence that Libby knew or believed that Wilson's wife was engaged in covert work. [emphasis added]

Fitzgerald Affidavit of August 27, 2004 - FN 15 on Page 28


13 posted on 02/09/2006 10:45:41 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Would you summarize this to mean:

The leaking of Plame's status of employment with the CIA, covert or not, classified or not, was ITSELF ALONE, never a consideration of criminal wrongdoing.

But rather, the investigation is into whether or not there was the BELIEF that her status of employment with the CIA was covert or classified and so it was (purposefully) released.





47 posted on 02/09/2006 11:46:05 AM PST by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson