[bvw]

Well, not quite. At least by scribe Gefter's take. She says Popper's falsifiability is not the big reason that ID isn't science. If so, then you'd be right: esoteric confections like string theory, multi-verses etc. would not be able to be mentioned outside of a mythology course. Yet string theory is science. Why?

Because being such an estoric theory it is "grand and beautiful". (She can say "grandiose and beautiful" that because she's never done the math of it, btw.)

[Mind-numbed Robot]

Are scientists still seeking a unifying theory?

If so, do they anticipate, in light of the mathematics, that it will be orderly or chaotic?

Is the theory of chaos itself one of order in chaos?

Does orderly necessarily equate to intelligent or is intelligent an idea we impose on it? (Of course all meaning is imposed by us.)

Does intelligence necessarily imply a creator?

If so, is that logical?

If not, what is all the hullabaloo about?