Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Their collective heads may explode any time now...
1 posted on 02/08/2006 2:15:29 PM PST by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: abb
If they publish the pictures, there is the possibility that enraged muslims may be inspired to target and kill journalists, so they won't do it.

When they published the Abu Gharib pictures, there was the possibility that enraged muslims might be inspired to target and kill US soldiers, so they published them as soon and as often as they could.

Journalists are super valuable.

2 posted on 02/08/2006 2:18:02 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
"The bottom line for me is that the cartoon is so highly offensive to millions of Muslims that it's preferable to describe it in words rather than posting it on the web," said NPR News executive Bill Marimow...

I guess Bill figures his house is easy to find.

3 posted on 02/08/2006 2:18:38 PM PST by rickmichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Perhaps we can persuade George Clooney to wear some t-shirts with these cartoons on them in some public appearances.

In the interests of supporting artistic freedom of expression, of course.


4 posted on 02/08/2006 2:19:22 PM PST by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb


Anyone remember when "Fahrenheit 9-11" was in theaters and all the theater owners that decided not to carry the film were attacked for censorship?


5 posted on 02/08/2006 2:20:27 PM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Publish the pics, lets see if the table cloth heads riot here.


6 posted on 02/08/2006 2:20:40 PM PST by Meadow Muffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
Suddenly, they no longer print offensive comics.


7 posted on 02/08/2006 2:21:01 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

"Eric Mink, commentary editor at the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, explains in a column today: "If a government controls what can and cannot be distributed, it’s called censorship. If a media outlet decides for itself what to include and exclude from its products — whether for journalistic or economic reasons, out of respect for possible sensitivities of some readers or concern about possible impact on its community — it’s called editorial judgment. "

No...it is called COWARDICE AND HYPOCRISY!!


8 posted on 02/08/2006 2:21:42 PM PST by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Pssst! They're published on the internet!


9 posted on 02/08/2006 2:22:14 PM PST by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

So the media knew the Muslim world would be enraged at the Abu Graib pictures and published them anyway since the outrage would be directed at our soldiers.

And now the media won't publish cartoons because the Muslim outrage would be directed at them. The media. Who, collectively, seem to be cowards.


10 posted on 02/08/2006 2:22:18 PM PST by Peach (Islam is an army disguised as a religion (Freeper Hoosier-Daddy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Their hypocrisy is on full display. Too bad the old media is no longer needed.


13 posted on 02/08/2006 2:23:38 PM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

My take is that we should do everything in our power to piss the islamofacists off!


14 posted on 02/08/2006 2:25:38 PM PST by rocksblues (John McCain says adopt a terrorist today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
By not posting it on the web, we demonstrate a respect

That's a new one for NPR. Respect? They don't know the meaning of the word.

17 posted on 02/08/2006 2:26:19 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
...we demonstrate a respect for deeply held religious beliefs

And what would those "beliefs" be? That Mohammud never actually had a bomb growing out his head?

20 posted on 02/08/2006 2:29:31 PM PST by Lekker 1 ("Computers in the future may have only 1000 vacuum tubes..." - Popular Mechanics, March 1949)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

bump


21 posted on 02/08/2006 2:29:56 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Newspaper editors need not worry about the cartoons that have upset Muslims. It's yesterday's news now. Muslims are not a factor in the modern world so whatever offends them is not important.

However when they break a civil law in protest over an imagined insult they should go to jail.


22 posted on 02/08/2006 2:32:00 PM PST by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

-"It's not censorship, self or otherwise," said Deputy World Editor Jim Michaels.-

Here's the definition of censorship: Prevention of disturbing or painful thoughts or feelings from reaching consciousness except in a disguised form.

Again, as always, lefties are using words inappropriately.


23 posted on 02/08/2006 2:36:33 PM PST by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

They ALL must show the cartoons on the same morning on the front pages! It's the news and that's why they're called "newspapers". DO IT CHICKEN LIVERS!!!


24 posted on 02/08/2006 2:56:08 PM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

The Rocky Mountain News in Denver, Colorado, published one of the cartoons yesterday on the editorial page. Large size. (It was the "stop, stop we have run out of virgins" one)


27 posted on 02/08/2006 3:04:24 PM PST by dynachrome ("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
New York Times Executive Editor Bill Keller said that he and his staff concluded after a "long and vigorous debate" that publishing the cartoon would be "perceived as a particularly deliberate insult" by Muslims.

So they dug into their archives and illustrated an article about the Moslem "cartoon rage" with Virgin Mary made out of elephant dung.

34 posted on 02/08/2006 3:19:51 PM PST by Alouette (Psalms of the Day: 55-59)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

These MSM cowards are even more spineless than the French.


36 posted on 02/08/2006 3:28:16 PM PST by colorado tanker (We need more "chicken-bleep Democrats" in the Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson