Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Rep. Heather Wilson Calls for NSA Probe
NewsMax ^ | 2/8/06

Posted on 02/08/2006 10:19:09 AM PST by areafiftyone

The Republican chairwoman of the House subcommittee charged with overseeing the National Security Agency announced her own misgivings with the Bush administration’s controversial terrorist surveillance program Tuesday and called for a full congressional inquiry into the matter.

The congresswoman, Rep. Heather Wilson, R-N.M., is chair of the House Intelligence Subcommittee on Technical and Tactical Intelligence.

With the announcement, she became the first Republican on an Intelligence Committee, from either the House or Senate, to call for a full investigation.

Wilson told the New York Times that she had "serious concerns,” arising, at least partially, from the fact that the administration has withheld information about the operation from lawmakers.

Though Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee Monday, the inquiry was limited to the legal justifications for the operation and did not reach operational detail. The administration has also met frequently with the Gang of Eight – a group that includes party leaders in the House and Senate, and both intelligence committees.

But Wilson said continued limited briefings were "increasingly untenable.”

Vice President Cheney explained the administration’s reticence to discuss operational details of the program in an interview Tuesday on "The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer.”

"It’s important for us,” he said, "if we’re going to proceed legislatively, to keep in mind there’s a price to be paid for that, and it might well in fact do irreparable damage to our capacity to collect information.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: 109th; doj; dojprobe; heatherwilson; nsa; probe; spying
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: areafiftyone
Here's something you can probe, Heather.....a hemorrhoid so big a person can stand in it


21 posted on 02/08/2006 10:42:24 AM PST by NRA1995 (If feminists are so smart, why do they need masturbation workshops?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Wilson told the New York Times that she had "serious concerns,” arising, at least partially, from the fact that the administration has withheld information about the operation from lawmakers.

This is simply a turf battle. She's trying to make herself look big time by standing up to Bush and demanding relevance for the Congress.

22 posted on 02/08/2006 10:43:28 AM PST by TravisBickle (The War on Terror: Win It There or Fight It Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Heather was a Rhodes scholar, also the first congresscritter ever that also graduated from the USAF
Academy, per her bio.


23 posted on 02/08/2006 10:43:35 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
There is an old and trusted way to tell if someone will leak information at work, or other places.


Simply take that person aside, tell him something in confidence that is plausible, a complete fabrication, and made up by you. Tell no one else.

If you hear it come back, keep the bastid at arms length for your own protection.





24 posted on 02/08/2006 10:44:22 AM PST by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Republican Main Street Partnership
Congressional Members
109th Congress

Rep. Heather Wilson, New Mexico

http://republicanmainstreet.org/

'Nuff said.


25 posted on 02/08/2006 10:49:00 AM PST by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
Then you'll know who is the leaker.

Yep.

26 posted on 02/08/2006 10:53:27 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Condimaniac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
 

I always get a charge out of the knee jerking people that accuse anyone that remotely disagrees with their personal thinking, of being a RINO. Here's a few of her positions. Apparently "true" Republicans voted differently and her RINO accusers must be against these positions also.

Heather Wilson on Abortion
  • Voted YES on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
  • Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life. (Oct 2003)
  • Voted YES on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
  • Voted YES on funding for health providers who don't provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)
  • Voted YES on banning human cloning, including medical research. (Jul 2001)
  • Voted YES on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
  • Voted YES on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001)
  • Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
  • Voted YES on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999)
  • Rated 10% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record. (Dec 2003)
Heather Wilson on Civil Rights
  • Voted YES on Constitutional Amendment banning same-sex marriage. (Sep 2004)
  • Voted YES on protecting the Pledge of Allegiance. (Sep 2004)
  • Voted YES on constitutional amendment prohibiting flag desecration. (Jun 2003)
  • Voted YES on Constitutional amendment prohibiting Flag Desecration. (Jul 2001)
  • Voted NO on banning gay adoptions in DC. (Jul 1999)
  • Voted YES on Amendment to prohibit burning the US flag. (Jun 1999)
  • Supports anti-flag desecration amendment. (Mar 2001)
  • Rated 13% by the ACLU, indicating an anti-civil rights voting record. (Dec 2002)
  • Supported legislation on violence against women & safety. (Jul 1999)
  • Supported funding for women's and disadvantaged businesses. (Jul 1999)
Heather Wilson on Education
  • Voted YES on allowing school prayer during the War on Terror. (Nov 2001)
  • Voted YES on requiring states to test students. (May 2001)
  • Voted YES on allowing vouchers in DC schools. (Aug 1998)
  • Let schools display the words "God Bless America". (Oct 2001)
  • Rated 33% by the NEA, indicating anti-public education votes. (Dec 2003)
  • Supported funding for teacher training & other initiatives. (Jul 1999)
Heather Wilson on Energy & Oil
Click here for OR .
  • Voted YES on passage of the Bush Administration national energy policy. (Jun 2004)
  • Voted YES on implementing Bush-Cheney national energy policy. (Nov 2003)
  • Voted NO on raising CAFE standards; incentives for alternative fuels. (Aug 2001)
  • Voted NO on prohibiting oil drilling & development in ANWR. (Aug 2001)
  • Voted YES on starting implementation of Kyoto Protocol. (Jun 2000)
Heather Wilson on Foreign Policy
  • Voted NO on keeping Cuba travel ban until political prisoners released. (Jul 2001)
  • Voted YES on withholding $244M in UN Back Payments until US seat restored. (May 2001)
  • Voted NO on $156M to IMF for 3rd-world debt reduction. (Jul 2000)
  • Voted YES on Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China. (May 2000)
  • Voted YES on $15.2 billion for foreign operations. (Nov 1999)
Heather Wilson on Free Trade
  • Voted YES on implementing the US-Australia Free Trade Agreement. (Jul 2004)
  • Voted YES on implementing the US-Singapore free trade agreement. (Jul 2003)
  • Voted YES on implementing free trade agreement with Chile. (Jul 2003)
  • Voted NO on withdrawing from the WTO. (Jun 2000)
  • Voted YES on 'Fast Track' authority for trade agreements. (Sep 1998)
  • Rated 50% by CATO, indicating a mixed record on trade issues. (Dec 2002)
Heather Wilson on Government Reform
  • Voted YES on limiting attorney's fees in class action lawsuits. (Feb 2005)
  • Voted YES on restricting frivolous lawsuits. (Sep 2004)
  • Voted NO on campaign finance reform banning soft-money contributions. (Feb 2002)
  • Voted YES on banning soft money donations to national political parties. (Jul 2001)
  • Voted NO on banning soft money and issue ads. (Sep 1999)
Heather Wilson on Gun Control
  • Voted YES on prohibiting suing gunmakers & sellers for gun misuse. (Apr 2003)
  • Voted YES on decreasing gun waiting period from 3 days to 1. (Jun 1999)
  • Rated A by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun rights voting record. (Dec 2003)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


27 posted on 02/08/2006 10:57:22 AM PST by HawaiianGecko (Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I just wrote Rep Wilson this email:

"Rep Wilson. I understand that you are calling for "hearings or probes" into the President's Terrorist Surveillance Program. Don't you know that you will be further exposing our country to more terrorist attacks with this "probe"? How can you do such a thing to our country when you have sworn to uphold our laws? The Constitution says our President is the Commander in Chief and he authorized and REQUIRED to defend our country in a time of WAR. What is so difficult to understand about that? Please DO NOT follow through with these "probes" that you told the New York Times about. This is rediculous!!!"

Her web site contact page is: http://wilson.house.gov/Contact.asp


28 posted on 02/08/2006 10:59:27 AM PST by W04Man (Bush2004 Grassroots Campaign We Did It! NOW.... PLEASE STAY THE COURSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

I wouldn't label her a RINO - she's just WRONG on this position.


29 posted on 02/08/2006 11:08:18 AM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
AND SHE IS A GRADUATE OF THE AIR FORCE ACADEMY!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh my God!!! I'm embarrassed. As an AF retiree, I'm dumbfounded.

30 posted on 02/08/2006 11:10:10 AM PST by W04Man (Bush2004 Grassroots Campaign We Did It! NOW.... PLEASE STAY THE COURSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
 
"I wouldn't label her a RINO - she's just WRONG on this position."

Now, I'll agree with that!


31 posted on 02/08/2006 11:13:26 AM PST by HawaiianGecko (Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: W04Man
 
I'm sure her calculation is that calling for an investigation has no downside except for the waste of money. It makes her look in favor of "sunshine" (good for her in a swing state) and the worst thing that could possibly happen is that the investigation uncovers the unmitigated protection of the American public by President Bush.  The only thing the Dems will be able to hang their hat on is: "how dare this President protect Americans at all cost? The Gaul of this man."

lol


32 posted on 02/08/2006 11:19:23 AM PST by HawaiianGecko (Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I'm getting sick and tired of all these "investigations" where all they do is create news items. Perhaps a mandatory requirement before an investigation can begin would be a determination of the legality or illegality of the issue. Legality or illegality seem to me to be a statement of governing law in accordance with the statutes and the constitution. An investigation should be used to determine the facts pertaining only to illegal/unconstitutional issues, following the determination of legality. All this rhetoric does is cloud the issue and puts the cart before the horse.


33 posted on 02/08/2006 11:26:53 AM PST by Real Cynic No More (A member of the Appalachian-American minority -- and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More

I'm tired of representatives trying to bargain in the press. If she wants to know, got to Hoekstra and ask him, he's the committee head.

I think Congress should hold more hearings on administration activity, not less. In fact, they should routinely hold hearings on everything they can think of.

First, it would keep them from thinking up ways to screw us even more.

Second, it would take away the RATs ability to scream about not holding hearings.

Third, since everything would be subject to hearings, having a hearing wouldn't imply any malfeasance, which currently is why the republicans are so afraid of having a hearing.

The congress has a responsibility to oversee how the business of government is running, and to do so they should have hearings. There were PLENTY of hearings when Clinton was in office, we should have simply kept that up.

Not having hearings just contributes a real issue to the largely false culture of corruption argument. Let's not give the democrats any real issues.

NOW, in this particular case, I'm not sure how a public hearing is going to help her if her problem is that she wants to know stuff that is being withheld because of secrecy concerns.


34 posted on 02/08/2006 11:36:10 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

I agree it's not a question of being any RINO overall, though I would say this: on a matter of the most critical national importance, with the 'Rats and MSM working overtime to dishonestly harm the WH and the country on this issue, Rep. Wilson (and Senator SPECTRE) have given the 'Rats cover to claim their assault is not the scummy partisan maneuvering that everyone knows it to be. Unless she has firm knowledge that what she is doing will blow up the 'Rats big-time (with what might be revealed in hearings, etc.), I would say that she is displaying very poor judgment to undermine the WH on such a vital issue. And even if more hearings and investigations could backfire on the 'Rats, she should remember that the MSM will have a huge say in what the public is told about it - despite the advances of the blogosphere, etc. the MSM still controls a great deal of the public news agenda and a huge % of the public gets their only impressions of any issue from what the liberal talking heads tell them. Rep. Wilson has just given them ammo that they should not have had from a Republican.


35 posted on 02/08/2006 11:39:47 AM PST by Enchante (Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody

I think "Justanobody" has nailed what her problem is:
Republican Main Street Partnership is funded in part by George Soros.


36 posted on 02/08/2006 11:41:27 AM PST by threeleftsmakearight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

"how dare this President protect Americans at all cost? The Gaul of this man."


so Bush has some french in him?


Listening on terrorist activities by one country's Administration can never be considered spying...but rather foresight.


37 posted on 02/08/2006 11:45:15 AM PST by kajingawd (" happy with stone underhead, let Heaven and Earth go about their changes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kajingawd

no, its de Gaul..... he he


38 posted on 02/08/2006 12:11:11 PM PST by W04Man (Bush2004 Grassroots Campaign We Did It! NOW.... PLEASE STAY THE COURSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Did she miss yesterdays hearings?


39 posted on 02/08/2006 12:12:37 PM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Blacklist her.


40 posted on 02/08/2006 12:13:27 PM PST by Flavius Josephus (Enemy Idealogies: Pacifism, Liberalism, and Feminism, Islamic Supremacism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson