To: Tarkin
So, it is long past tiem for conservatives to take the respendican party to the wood shed. If that mean withholding support and letting a few go down in flames as an example to the rest so be it. Socialism fast or socialism slow what is the big difference.
34 posted on
02/08/2006 11:12:19 AM PST by
TXBSAFH
(Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
To: TXBSAFH
As I wrote in post 30, currently the federal judiciary is the only reason (OK, Barbara Mikulski is probably the other one). BTW, not all is lost. After all, before the New Deal the Republican Party was considered the "more liberal" of the two parties, then both parties had their liberal and conservative wings fairly balanced, and finally in the 60s the conservatives started taking control of the Republican Party. So maybe in 50-60 years the Republican Party will finally become a truly conservative party :-).
37 posted on
02/08/2006 11:20:50 AM PST by
Tarkin
(Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito...one more to go)
To: TXBSAFH
"Socialism fast or socialism slow what is the big difference"
As far as I'm concerned, that's all we can affect by voting, and then its only a maybe.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson