As a matter of fact, I CAN build a Russian military base on my property; it's my right as a property owner.
However, the government is Constitutionally charged with deciding who may enter and stay in this country, so the troops to man that base would not be allowed to be here, unless of course the government, as it is allowed to do by the Constitution, strikes a treaty with Russia allowing them to have military personnel on the ground in this country.
Do you have any more bulls#t you need me to address?
In order for your argument about a private property owner not being able to set the conditions to your access to his property to be true, you are going to have to convince me that I have to allow you on my property and in my house with a gun, against my wishes.
You can't.
The only way to do so would be for the government to cave in under pressure from the mob, and write legislation to usurp my rights as a property owner.
They normally don't have a problem with doing that, as we have seen with the notion of eminent domain, and they will be more than happy to cater to idiots who are willing to trade a little liberty in exchange for parking.
This is not about your right to bear arms, no one has impeeded your ability to carry a weapon. This is about convenient parking.
What a sad, pathetic lot you are, trading basic liberty for convenient parking.
If you can't treat your employees as free and sentient beings, with equal Rights, you won't soon have a lot of quality people working for you... You'll have dregs and drones.
400 posts and you are still arguing like a Cuban communist.