It amazes me how some think the property owner has no say if people bring arms onto their property.And they somehow think they have freedoms of speech, religion, and the like while on someones private property, when in fact they do not.
I don't think this has been thought through to its end by many of the 2nd Amendment activists. Almost impulsively, whenever someone wants to allow, by law, firearms to be permitted somewhere, they are all for it. Be damned any deeper thought.
I would like to know if anyone who supports this thinks it would be ok if your state passed legislation allowing anyone to carry a firearm on your property who wanted to, whether you permitted it or not regardless of your wishes?