Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mulder

Come on man, you can't be this thick and actually believe yourself a conservative.

If I fall down on your drive way, you are liable for my injuries. If I am attacked on your property, you are liable for my injuries.

The reason for "banning" guns is that the property owner has the right AS A PROPERTY OWNER to set rules and conditions for your access and continued presence in his property.


118 posted on 02/10/2006 2:23:26 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez
the property owner has the right AS A PROPERTY OWNER to set rules and conditions for your access and continued presence in his property.

How about if my skin is black, and you require that people have white skin before entering your parking lot?

Your arguments sound a lot like the segregationists in the South. By chance are you a former Dixiecrat?

120 posted on 02/10/2006 2:28:02 PM PST by Mini-14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez
If I fall down on your drive way, you are liable for my injuries. If I am attacked on your property, you are liable for my injuries.

This varies from state to state. Under common law, the property owner is only liable in cases of extreme negligence.

The courts and legislatures have expanded the scope of liability, resulting in some people enacting anti-gun policies. That is a de facto gun ban by the state.

126 posted on 02/10/2006 2:33:59 PM PST by Mulder (“The spirit of resistance is so valuable, that I wish it to be always kept alive" Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson