Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez
It's quite probable that the liability could also go the other way, and if something bad (or even not so bad) ever happened with a legally-carried firearm at a private business that respected individual carry, the lawyers would be all over that as well. That particular profession does seem to excel at profiting equally well no matter which way the balance tips.

So as I said before, decisions would best be made on the side of individual liberty. Decisions made by the business owner, preferably.

103 posted on 02/10/2006 1:32:11 PM PST by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Joe Brower
"So as I said before, decisions would best be made on the side of individual liberty."

Individual liberty is enforced when the owner freely decides to not allow anyone to park on his lot if they carry a gun, and the person carrying the gun choses to park elsewhere.

Individual liberties are lost when one of the two individuals involved are forced, via force of government, to act against their wishes when it comes to their individual rights.

106 posted on 02/10/2006 1:40:17 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson