Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MamaTexan
There are such studies, unfortunately few people read them. Last several "chemical" and "additive" studies I read through suggested that the risk is so negligible, we should spend more of our time worrying about not getting enough exercise.

That, BTW, is a result that seems to be exceedingly unpopular. That's why those studies don't get the notice they deserve.

66 posted on 02/08/2006 3:47:21 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
Last several "chemical" and "additive" studies I read through suggested that the risk is so negligible, we should spend more of our time worrying about not getting enough exercise.

If I hadn't recently become totally intolerant of certain chemicals, I probably would not have paid much attention either.

I've seen studies on single applications of chemicals, but what I haven't seen is a study on the accumulative and/or combination dangers of chemicals. If you know of any such studies, please let me know.

Until recently, I didn't know chemicals like ethers, formaldehyde and formaldehyde releases were even IN the stuff I was putting on myself.

Now, I have to read and decipher every chemical on the label. Some don't even have all the chemicals listed. I have to look up the Material Safety Data Sheet on the net.

Heres a good place to check a lot of products:
Skin Deep

--------

Disclaimer:
I am NOT a tree hugger. The last time I hugged a tree, it was 20 years ago & I was 3 sheets to the wind. :)

67 posted on 02/08/2006 3:59:06 PM PST by MamaTexan (I am NOT a ~legal entity~, nor am I a *person* as created by law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson