Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eagles Talon IV

I just think we need to properly prioritize the importance of "procedures" and properly define what constitutes "lax", in the context of life-threatening injuries in combat. Saving the lives of wounded soldiers needs to be the absolute first priority for personnel whose duties involve rescuing and treating them, and to the extent that compliance with procedures would cause even a few seconds delay, the procedures need to be tossed out the window.

We could save military personnel from a lot of unnecessary paperwork, by having a blanket policy that any military-issued gear in the possession of a soldier who is critically wounded in combat, is automatically written off. If some of it happens to turn up in useable condition it can be recorded as such, but I have a big problem with the idea of emergency medical personnel in combat theaters being pestered with stupid forms they have to fill out and sign, in order to prevent a critically wounded soldier from being hit with a bill for items that were most likely blown off his body or ripped off and tossed aside by medics.

I'm sure the Army already has a clear system in place for classifying the severity and combat/non-combat context of injuries. So it would be easy to limit the automatic write-offs to serious combat injuries, and exclude the inventory held by soldiers who were treated for bumps and bruises in a combat theater, or who were critically injured while driving drunk near their U.S base.


122 posted on 02/08/2006 10:19:56 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: GovernmentShrinker
I believe we have to wait and hear the other side in this case. Other then that what you say makes sense and those procedures may already be in place. As I said, we have heard only one side and I am not personally familiar with the procedures now in place regarding battle injuries and assigned equiipment.
123 posted on 02/08/2006 10:53:42 AM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

To: GovernmentShrinker
We could save military personnel from a lot of unnecessary paperwork, by having a blanket policy that any military-issued gear in the possession of a soldier who is critically wounded in combat, is automatically written off.

That would still require paperwork to document. And who's to say that some future Lt would refuse to sign the paperwork that said he lost his gear because he was critically wounded in combat?

152 posted on 02/09/2006 2:31:05 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson