Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: binkdeville; All
If you watched Brit Hume's Special Report tonight, then you saw for the first time ever a major news outlet calling this war what it really is - a war against Islam and a war to save western civilization.

This is what I wrote to Brit Hume tonight:

Dear Mr. Hume,

I would to thank you, Fred Barnes, and Charles Krauthammer for finally defining this war. We are fighting a war against Islam to save western civilization. Islam is a bigoted, supremacist society incompatible with democracy and freedom. Mr. Barnes talked about Europe and its appeasement of Muslims, but we have to concern ourselves with Islam in our own country, in Canada, and even in Mexico.

Prior to President Bush's SOTU speech, C.A.I.R. sent him a letter asking him to refrain from using inflamatory language. He capitulated. The State Department did not issue the strong statement in support of freedom of the press and freedom of speech that it should have in regard to the cartoon controvery. Instead, they played the PC game. I understand we do not want more problems for our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, but did the White House forget why they are there?

Mr. Hume, I pray you and the rest of the people at FNC stay safe. C.A.I.R. may ask their members to email you in protest of your show tonight, but the situation has become so incendiary, that I worry for your safety. Please stay strong. Do NOT back down from your position. If an apology is demanded of you and you give in, the Muslims will have won yet another victory.

40 posted on 02/06/2006 9:26:09 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: sageb1

Nice work bro..Basically the Muslims are strong arming the public and mostly people are cowering and running scared. Be prepared for sever times ahead. we need to stop Islamics rom coming to the US YESTERDAY. I see here in the NYC area their population swelling by the day . The suburbs are loaded , the malls , everwhere. I dont trust them at all.


41 posted on 02/06/2006 9:31:23 PM PST by binkdeville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: sageb1
The State Department did not issue the strong statement in support of freedom of the press and freedom of speech that it should have in regard to the cartoon controvery.

Here's what the state department said, seems fairly strong ins the defense of freedom of speech and the press to me. State Dept. Daily Briefing for Feb 03, 2006

Our response is to say that while we certainly don't agree with, support, or in some cases, we condemn the views that are aired in public that are published in media organizations around the world, we, at the same time, defend the right of those individuals to express their views. For us, freedom of expression is at the core of our democracy and it is something that we have shed blood and treasure around the world to defend and we will continue to do so. ....

No. I think I made it very clear that our defense of freedom of expression and the ability of individuals and media organizations to engage in free expression is forthright and it is strong, you know. This is -- our First Amendment rights, the freedom of expression, are some of the most strongly held and dearly held views that we have here in America. And certainly nothing that I said, I would hope, would imply any diminution of that support.

Then the next day, the White issued a statement that said:

We stand in solidarity with Denmark and our European allies in opposition to the outrageous acts in Syria today.

Then on Monday the state department official spokesman, assistant secretary of state Scott McCormack, "clarified" the mistaken impression some MSM reports had promulgated earlier :

QUESTION: Can I just follow up on that? I mean, you have -- am I right in saying -- condemned the publication, criticized the publication of the cartoons, but what about free speech and --

MR. MCCORMACK: I'm not sure that that's what was said, Jonathan. I think we've said that we understood why many Muslims found the cartoons offensive. We found -- we talked about the fact that we found, on Friday, the cartoons offensive. But we also spoke out very clearly in support of freedom of the press. As to what appears in newspapers, what is broadcast over the air waves, those are decisions in free countries for a free media to make, for journalists as well as editors to make. So just you can finish your question but I just wanted to make clear what it is that we said on Friday.

QUESTION: I mean, is there anything that you can do to support countries like Denmark that are facing these acts of violence?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, we put -- the White House put out a statement over the weekend talking about our support for the Danish Prime Minister and the statements that he has made on the subject. Secretary Rice has also spoken with the Danish and Norwegian foreign ministers over the weekend in the wake of the attacks on their embassy as well. What we can do is to speak out very clearly in support of freedom of expression, freedom of the press, and urge understanding and tolerance, tolerance not violence. And I think that is what you're hearing from many quarters around the world concerning this issue.

50 posted on 02/06/2006 10:37:24 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: sageb1
Doesn't FNN have a Saudi prince as a significant stockholder? I understand that this prince calls the high-ups when things go anti-Muslim. Am I wrong?
86 posted on 02/09/2006 12:07:06 PM PST by ArmyTeach (Get a spine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson