To: TheForceOfOne
The last time The guy at post 214 defended someone, it was a troll in the War on Beer ZOT thread.
He thinks trolls should be given free reign and range to roam FRR.
If he's defending someone, that means there is likely a problem with the poster he is defending.
Like, the poster is a troll.
(We have a group of grumpy agitators who have nothing better to do than to wander around and defend trolls and claim we should 'debate' them.)
478 posted on
02/07/2006 4:43:59 AM PST by
Darksheare
(Aim low! They got knees!)
To: Darksheare
We have a group of grumpy agitators who have nothing better to do than to wander around and defend trolls and claim we should 'debate' them.We cannot focus on our mission to defend our constitution and our traditions when we are kept occupied by too many "devils in our midst."
484 posted on
02/07/2006 4:53:23 AM PST by
TaxRelief
(Wal-Mart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
To: Darksheare
Unlucky me! Thanks for the explanation, I was totally lost. lol
I had no intention of defending him/her. We each stand on our own merits. I was open on whether he/she was allowed to stay but I'll leave it to you guys to decide what to do. Thank again Darksheare.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson