Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WatchOutForSnakes

One thing that's different is that federal lands within a state are still within a state. Federal lands outside the state boundaries, like Blanco wants to grab, are a different matter. She might as well demand a royalty share of every oil tanker that enters Louisiana state waters regardless of where that oil actually came from.


30 posted on 02/06/2006 8:19:40 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone

The same could be said for Texas who also gets royalties from off shore drilling off of their coasts. Are they stealing profits? Is that illegal? Is that immoral? Is that reprehensible?


31 posted on 02/06/2006 8:27:54 PM PST by WatchOutForSnakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone

The point is this Dog GOne. What is needed is long term Coastal protection for the entire coast. Thats the issue. The point has been that Louisiana would use these funds excusively for that. Now before everyone goes Libertarian on me here we have noticed that various places have been protected by Fed Help. The Everglades is a big area where I have never heard people say thats Floridas problem dont spend money. The Coastal erosion problem is massive and cannot be funded soley by Louisiana. Its really a win for everyone if Louisiana Coast are protected. The oil royalty issue is being brought up because again it looks like the major problem is again to be overlooked


39 posted on 02/06/2006 8:44:52 PM PST by bayourant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson