The mailings he sent out in the primary portraying Coors as a homosexual advocate cost the Repubs the Senate seat, in my opinion. They were very graphic, and lost Coors a lot of conservative votes.
I didn't know much about Schaffer, living over on the other side of the state, but he came across as selfish and attacking, out only for himself.
I agree with the author about how great a candidate and person Bob Schaffer is. But this comment is unfair to Pete Coors. Gov. Owens had to arm-lock Coors before Coors would run. Pete Coors is a good man and a loyal Repblican. He just wasn't our best candidate. Pete thought he was doing it for the party and, unlike the State Party, acted honorably in his race against Schaffer.
Another tidbit, birdies tell me that Gov. Owens did his flip-flop on endorsing Schaffer (and, as the author puts it 'shivved' Schaffer) after the White House called and told Owens they didn't want Bob Schaffer in the Senate. The reason? Schaffer was a principled conservative who, as a congressman, had bucked the president on No Child Left Behind and the Prescription Drug Entitlement Program.
Actually, there is NO evidence for this statement at all. I know who was out walking precincts for Coors. It was overwhelmingly the conservative base.
Beg pardon, but they have seen the like. If I recall, Pat Schroeder had a vicious mouth on her, and was a lying low-life every chance she got too. Colorado is such a beautiful state, but like my own state of Washington, both elect such unsavory people to high office.
Schaffer would have been lucky to get within 10 points of Salazar. The only Republican in Colorado who could have defeated Salazar would have been Owens and that only would have happened if he and Frances hadn't separated.
He sounds as looney as Ward Churchill. What's in the water in Colorado?