Posted on 02/06/2006 6:08:53 AM PST by ken5050
Good Monday morning, once again, fellow political jinkies. The NFL season may be over, but the political season inside the Beltway is 24/7/365. So join us, if you can, as those wacky Dems on the Senate Judiciary committee reprise their pitiful efforts to once again smear President Bush and score political points..
This Democrat trickery, "trip-'em-up" and entrapment is like a kangaroo court on steroids.
Hopefully not before Coryn clears up the garbage spewed by the nasties.
If they had proof that some pinko had been tapped, we'd have heard about it by now.
They wouldn't have been able to stop themselves from telling that.
And I doubt there is anybody out there in the "real world" who knows who they have listened to.
Make him watch this with you....tell him you are doing an important job and a lot of people are hanging on every word you put on here!
Easy on the eyes, too. ;-D
Me too. Our own personal Dudley Doright.
Cornyn bringing up leakers.
thank you Cboldt - there it is in black and white. What part don't they understand when even I can comprehend it.
It must be pure Hell to have to be civil around those dems all the time. I would go stark raving mad.
lol..well, maybe I will take two zantac and go read the next wave of attacks against our country by the left.
They're trying to make the case that the President should be impeached.
Indeed! He always looks as if he just came out of a shower.
Cornyn knows that Gonzales can't answer the question. He's just letting the NYT that they are coming after them. LOL
Exactly.
Cornyn: Our espionage laws that criminalize the intention leaking of classified info -- I under DOJ is looking into who leaked to the NYT and whether those laws were violated.
Does the investigation include a violation for publishing information:
Gonzales: (I didn't understand his answer)
Cornyn: Is there protection in the law that if you get a leak and publish, there's a protection from publishing?
Gonzales: Declines to answer on behalf of NYT attoreys.
This greatest of civil wars was not gradually developed by
pupular commotion, tumultuous assemblies, or local unorganized insurrections. However long may have been its previous conception, it nevertheless sprung forth suddenly from the parent brain, a Minerva in the full panoply of war. The President was bound to meet it in the shape it presented itself, without waiting for Congress to baptize it with a name; and no name given to it by him or them could change the fact. It is not the less a civil war, with belligerent parties in hostile array, because it may be called an 'insurrection' by one side, and the insurgents be considered as rebels or traitors. Prize Cases Page 67 U.S. 635, 669
It is not the less a civil war, with belligerent parties in hostile array, because it may be called an 'insurrection' by one side, and the insurgents be considered as rebels or traitors.
I am a big Cornyn fan too!
mayber Rockefellar would like to book a flight out of the country about now? perhaps save some seats for the NYT's personel?
Yep. "We haven't forgotten about you, NYT."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.