Global Manipulators Move Beyond Petroleum

New Dawn Magazine ^ | SUSAN BRYCE

[Calpernia]

Maurice Strong mentioned

[Calpernia]

Rockefellar mentioned

[Willie Green]

Big Oil has found it profitable to utilize the enviromental movement to keep fuel prices high and "excess" oil off the market. Few, if any, of the "alternatives" that they advocate will every truly be competitive in the near future. And don't expect them to support any REAL competition to oil consumption such as Nuclear Power and electricly powered mass-transit systems and high-speed rail.

[q_an_a]

Long read, some interesting data. thanks for the post. One thing people leave out of all of the portions of the "oil economy" is the plastic stuff the holds everything that can be stolen in stores. In addition, power tools have so much plastic that it would take a miracle to cut our useage of oil - just for these simple areas. Fuel economy in cars, trucks and airplanes has nothing to do with flex pipe running through thousands of new homes.

[reluctantwarrior]

bttt

[Calpernia]

Had to be a long read. I wanted the names of the World Business Council up there.

I found this article looking up the companies that are behind the microchipping movement.


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1565481/posts
USDA steps up efforts to track livestock


http://nationalpropertyowners.org
National Property Owners

Full research sections on National Animal Identification System (NAIS)


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1563271/posts
Healthy People 2010

Information on where the funding came from for NAIS


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1561077/posts
Animal Tagging and SCHOOL LUNCHES???

Information on some of the partners on these posts


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1564815/posts
Digital Angel and Microchip

Info on the technology that will be used for the tagging





Not complying with the microchipping is a Class C felony. You will lose your rights to bear arms and vote.

[Calpernia]

bump

[IronJack]

The oil barons are trying to expand their dominions. They are not willing to give up their stranglehold on our energy supplies, whether they be petroleum or other technology. Once they have determined the direction energy will take in the future, they will start to monopolize it the same way they have oil.

This must not happen again.

[Calpernia]

This has gotten way past monopolies IronJack.

These barons are now microchipping.

They are chipping our plants and trees:

http://www.cfr.washington.edu/research.pfc/publications/fall_2002_web.pdf
Precision Forestry

I added the links above about the Animal laws

And it is being snuck into health insurance coverage.

[Steveone]

The traitor impeached China builder America destroyer clinton should never allowed Amoco and Arco to be sold to BP along with Elk Hills to Hammers commie co-op

[USS Alaska]

I read the "HOLE" thing so you don't have to, and here is the paragraph that says it all.

The destroyers of our planet have usurped us. In the first decade of the new century, we may have had an opportunity to throw off the shackles of corporate control. A post petroleum world would offer many opportunities for independence, not the globalist vision of interdependence being foisted upon us. A post petroleum world would provide scope for food self-sufficiency, not food security, which the corporate capitalist system offers. A post petroleum world would provide the opportunity for people to look for real and lasting alternatives to the capitalist system.

Just another world ending, junk science, communist diatribe.

[satchmodog9]

Everyone seems to forget that stuff. Big oil is just Bush. Clinton let big oil get more Microsoftish while he was trying to break up Microsoft.

[Calpernia]

Before Bill Clinton left office, he authorized 2001 an 84% increase in the government's investment in nanotechnology research and development, National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/New/html/20000121_4.html and made it a top priority.

This governmental increase has been combined with non-governmental organizations (NGO) and grant programs. These NGOs have been creating partnerships with existing governmental agencies and masking initiatives as Federal and State grant reward programs.

I've no idea what this partnership between the NGOs and our governmental offices means. Are we part of the UN? Is that why and how the NGO money is getting into our government departments?

Who is calling the shots then?

The CFRs for grant monies that grantees apply for have terms and conditions that state the GRANTOR (NGO) has ownership.

So what were the terms and conditions of the governmental offices partnering with these funders????

[Steveone]

Sadly It all seems to be bushes fault in the eyes of the left.

[Steveone]

Wow I will read up on that more Thank you!

[Calpernia]

Please post anything you learn. Really appreciate it.

[Fedora]

Thanks! I didn't realize Nelson Rockefeller's son was involved in that, too. Sampson's comment on Kissinger and the IEA is also interesting. His book Seven Sisters is worth reading for background on oil politics through the mid-1970s.

[Calpernia]

I can't believe there is hardly anyone on this thread.

bumping.

[RightWhale]

Shell and BP are invested in alternative energy supplies. Can't call them resources, but maybe there is some profit in it or will be if they can sell any of it. Exxon and Chevron are not invested much in alternative energy at this point since the return is not worth it to them.