[illinoissmith]

Like I said, when I see your pals marching in the streets denouncing the psychopaths who seem to be running the "All Islam All The Time" channel.

So what would you have happen? Bomb everyone flat because the moderates aren't not out in the streets taking on better-armed, frenzied, violent, Saudi-funded maniacs?

I think Bush's approach defends us while not being unnecessarily brutal to others. We'll win because we're stronger and better and much, much more sane. And we don't need to bomb whole regions flat to do it.

[Lurker]

Not all of them, but I would start with Damascus and Tehran. Then I would make it perfectly clear to the Saudis that the next act of terror sponsored by their spawn Al Queda will get a W-88 dialed up to about 25 kilotons detonated right over Mecca.

If we kill enough of them, they'll stop fighting.

L

[kittymyrib]

Have you read Eli Wiesel's book, "Night"? The Jews refused to believe the reports that the Nazi's were rounding Jews up for the gas chambers. They kept telling themselves that surely such things couldn't happen. They were horribly wrong. I fear we are making the very same mistake. Sometimes preemptive destruction of a few thousand people will save millions. That was Truman's reason for dropping the atomic bombs, and it was a good reason.