Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
One element of Meese's argument is the grant of war-making powers to the President, by Congress.

Congress authorized this fight. After that, it is up to the President to carry it out.

If Congress disagrees with how the President is doing such, they can always rescind that power.

But what was the last vote on the war? Something like 400 to 3? They all talk big but they won't vote to back their talk.

Which makes them a bunch of slimy-assed weasels.

9 posted on 02/04/2006 2:27:38 PM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
SCOTUS delivered an object lesson in enumerated powers back during the Clinton Administration. They said that the line item veto was unconstitutional because Congress could not cede its powers to the executive without a Constitutional Amendment.

So if the Legislative is not allowed to cede its own powers, it definitely has no powers to infringe on the enumerated powers of the executive.


Congress authorized this fight ... If Congress disagrees with how the President is doing such, they can always rescind that power.
The real battle line is somewhere in the middle of those two postions of yours.

But what was the last vote on the war? Something like 400 to 3? They all talk big but they won't vote to back their talk.

That lopsided vote was on immediate pullout of Iraq - not on surveillance that has one leg on domestic soil.

Which makes them a bunch of slimy-assed weasels.

I concur with your assessment of Congress, but golly, you argue like a girl.

13 posted on 02/04/2006 7:38:37 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson