Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw
Word 6.0 is an imperfect copy of Word 5.5.

Did Word 5.5 replicate on its own to produce 6.0? If not, then your attempt at an analogy still fails miserably.

And yes, any sysop can write a script that causes a system to self-replicate, and even do so with variants -- say to handle the differences between a teacher's workstation and that of a students.

You're suggesting "variants" of specific definition, not analagous to biological life forms. You only further demonstrate that your analogy was completely invalid, inane and stupid from the very beginning.
67 posted on 02/05/2006 1:40:52 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
Your no-designer myopia blinders you. They are all analogies of how designs are replicate, how designs change from version to version. And such is exactly what the obseved variety of species can be -- that all species present on Earth today arose from one protogenitor cell is most improbable in comparison. Everything seen in cells and DNA can equally be explained by intentional design.

And just as running program code never sees nor senses the programmers and sysops, so we biologicals never see our designer -- yet we can infer design and designer.

68 posted on 02/05/2006 2:02:05 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson