Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Teaches Troops How to Pick a Spouse
http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL&fn=/2006/02/04/319128.html&cvqh=itn&ts=2006.02.04_ ^ | 2 4 06 | PAULINE JELINEK

Posted on 02/04/2006 5:41:48 AM PST by freepatriot32

WASHINGTON - They are the Pentagon's new "rules of engagement" _ the diamond ring kind. U.S. Army chaplains are trying to teach troops how to pick the right spouse, through a program called "How To Avoid Marrying a Jerk."

The matchmaking advice comes as military family life is being stressed by two tough wars. Defense Department records show more than 56,000 in the Army _ active, National Guard and Reserve _ have divorced since the campaign in Afghanistan started in 2001.

Officials partly blame long and repeated deployments which started after the invasion of Iraq in 2003 and stretched the service thin.

Troops also are coming home with life-altering injuries.

Many come back better people, others worse-off _ but either way, very changed from who they were when they wed.

"Being in the military certainly raises the stakes when you choose a mate," said Lt. Col. Peter Frederich, head of family issues in the Pentagon's chaplain office.

The "no jerks" program is also called "P.I.C.K. a Partner," for Premarital Interpersonal Choices and Knowledge.

It advises the marriage-bound to study a partner's F.A.C.E.S. _ family background, attitudes, compatibility, experiences in previous relationships and skills they'd bring to the union.

It teaches the lovestruck to pace themselves with a R.A.M. chart _ the Relationship Attachment Model _ which basically says don't let your sexual involvement exceed your level of commitment or level of knowledge about the other person.

Maj. John Kegley, a chaplain who teaches the program in Monterey, Calif., throws in the "no jerk salute" for fun. One hand at the heart, two-fingers at the brow mean use your heart and brain when choosing.

Though the acronyms and salute make it sound like something the Pentagon would come up with, the program was created by former minister John Van Epp of Ohio, who has a doctorate in psychology and a private counseling practice. He teaches it to Army chaplains, who in turn teach it to troops.

It also is used by social service agencies, prisons, churches and other civilian groups.

Commanders once discouraged troops from starting a family while serving. Thus the old saying: "If the Army wanted you to have a wife, it would have issued you one."

Today, the military supports families more than any other employer, Frederich said.

The Bush administration proposes to spend $5.6 billion in the next budget year for quality-of-life services for troops and their families.

That includes help with child care, education, spouse job hunting, legal assistance, commissaries, relocation counseling _ programs on every family issue imaginable _ to promote stability, and thus troop readiness.

Such support notwithstanding, "not everybody is cut out" to marry into the military, said Army spokeswoman Martha Rudd.

Some 740,000 people _ or a little more than half of all troops in the active-duty armed forces _ are married. Of those, some 96,000 had spouses also in uniform in the 2004 budget year, according to Pentagon figures.

The Army hopes the "no jerks" program will help couples decide if they are ready for a long-term commitment and can cope with the unique stresses of military life.

"Settings like military bases are incubators," said Van Epp, of Medina, Ohio. "They try to hatch ... relationships extremely fast," leading to higher divorce rates and more domestic violence.

The program teaches troops not to cave in to the pressure of a ticking clock _ like rushing to marry before shipping out for a deployment, or too soon after homecoming.

Last month, Van Epp sent 200 program workbooks to troops in Iraq.

___

On the Net:

Family support programs: http://www.militaryonesource.com

P.I.C.K a Partner http://www.nojerks.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: a; anamericansoldier; army; fubar; how; notissuedwithseabag; pentagon; pick; spouse; teaches; to; troops; waronerror; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 02/04/2006 5:41:53 AM PST by freepatriot32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

"If we wanted you maggots to have a wife we would issue you one." - Unknown Drill Sargent.


2 posted on 02/04/2006 5:44:12 AM PST by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

My first pick was not all that great.

Second time around was/is much better.


3 posted on 02/04/2006 5:44:32 AM PST by PeteB570 (NRA life member and I vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

i just wonder if the army is going to train the spouses on how to handle the shock and awe on the honeymoon :-)


4 posted on 02/04/2006 5:45:04 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

The Onion?


5 posted on 02/04/2006 5:45:33 AM PST by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

The ACLU will soon sue since this program discriminated against sluts and gays.


6 posted on 02/04/2006 5:48:29 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
How do you tell when your husband has married a soldier?

When he makes the bed and folds his clothes better than you do.

7 posted on 02/04/2006 5:52:03 AM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (The Democratic Party-Jackass symbol, jackass leaders, jackass supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

I applaud the efforts.


8 posted on 02/04/2006 5:52:29 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
"rules of engagement"

lol

So what do they call their contraception initiative?

Missile defense?

9 posted on 02/04/2006 5:52:37 AM PST by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Ladies, best avoid men whose idea of foreplay is yelling "incoming," or "Geronimo."


10 posted on 02/04/2006 5:54:25 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
The divorce rate in the military is terrible. In the navy, it is 80%. The odds are hard. Of course, many navy marriages are doomed from the start. Young men barely out of high school marry a young woman still in her teens so that he can receive BAH and BAS and move out of the barracks. Then he goes to sea for a six month deployment and the wife is left at home alone with access to his increasingly-growing bank account. And she's young and probably on her own for the first time as well and she hangs out and goes "clubbing' with other young navy wives and, well, you can figure out the rest.

I see it all the time.

On the flip side, I see sailors who vow that they would never cheat on their wives and then find themselves in a notorious port with booze in their system, surrounded by throngs of young, beautiful (and very willing) foreign ladies. The famous cry of "What happens in port stays in port!" is heard and these men go crazy.

I've seen this countless times as well.

11 posted on 02/04/2006 5:58:39 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Nice stereotypes...


12 posted on 02/04/2006 5:59:37 AM PST by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

56,000 in the Army _ active, National Guard and Reserve _ have divorced since the campaign in Afghanistan started in 2001.

Some 740,000 people _ or a little more than half of all troops in the active-duty armed forces _ are married.

Of those, some 96,000 had spouses also in uniform in the 2004 budget year, according to Pentagon figures.
88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

What a frivolous, outcome-based article, LOL The above are the only facts I can see in it.

But, if about half of the 740k are ARMy, 56k divorces ain't bad--a ratio of about 1 divorce per 13 marriages endind in divorce over a 5 year period. Civilian stats are worse than that, I think. (In this quick math, I have assumed that about half of all active duty troops are Army)


13 posted on 02/04/2006 6:01:29 AM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

Same here. I could have used this training prior to #1.


14 posted on 02/04/2006 6:04:06 AM PST by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

whoops, shound have typed 1 divorce in 6.5 marriages......


15 posted on 02/04/2006 6:05:28 AM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

I recently saw a rerun of 'In Living Color' where the bum is trying to get into the army. Get an ugly wife and a messed up life, In the Arrrrmy!


16 posted on 02/04/2006 6:08:49 AM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dakine
Nice stereotypes...

Are you saying that what I wrote is not true? Or rarely happens? I know many happily married sailors. Most of them are older and/or on their second or third wives.

For many (and by no means all) young, impetuous navy marriages end disastrously.

17 posted on 02/04/2006 6:09:43 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
I'm proud to say the military supports THIS family. And vice versa.


18 posted on 02/04/2006 6:14:04 AM PST by shezza (4 ... and counting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
through a program called "How To Avoid Marrying a Jerk."

Could they have picked a worse name for this program? Are our military "Teen Magazine" readers?
19 posted on 02/04/2006 6:17:21 AM PST by Vision ("There are no limits to growth because there are no limits of human intelligence" Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

A lot of the marriages that end as a result of deployment were headed that way anyway. It takes a very special person to be able to live their lives when their spouse is gone and then quickly re-adjust when they return. Military families are some of the strongest people on the planet, and when you've found the right one there is no stronger love.


20 posted on 02/04/2006 6:27:54 AM PST by McGavin999 (If Intelligence Agencies can't find leakers, how can we expect them to find terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson