Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neutronsgalore
Even factoring in the depression, we had the highest standard of living in the world before WWII with no more than 5% of our economy dependent upon trade.

That is a very interesting fact. Now will you answer the question?

And as we become more dependent upon other countries for our standard of living, the more fragile and vulnerable it becomes to attack.

Is that a back door admission that trade raises our standard of living?

682 posted on 02/06/2006 6:10:55 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot; fallujah-nuker

"Is that a back door admission that trade raises our standard of living?"

No, because another good measure of standard of living is determined by the ability to aquire material necessities/wants with cash/check/debit derived from wages & other income. An ever-increasing percentage of the US population, to maintain the same standard of living, has to rely more and more on the use of credit cards, lines of credit/home-equity loans, home refi's, pay day loans etc... In other words they have to bury themselves in debt they'll never repay. In 1955 the average wage-earner could save up enough money in 5 years or less to buy a brand-new American car or truck outright with cash. Try that today. The problem is that most of what people look at to determine "standard of living" is what car you're driving, how up to date your home electronics are, and how big your house is...not HOW you obtained them. Have you ever seen that commercial with the guy bragging about all that he has, and then telling you that: "I'm in debt up to my eyeballs!" That commercial is very easily representive of America as a whole. On the surface his life seems grand, but he's on an ever thinning string towards financial collapse. The United States is steadily more and more in that condition through free-trade policies. In 20 years, if we keep on this penny-wise pound-foolish path, China's going to have a very big set of scissors to cut that string with.


687 posted on 02/06/2006 7:13:53 PM PST by neutronsgalore (Waffling George has failed to secure the borders...now it's Bouncing Betty's turn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson