So now a Supreme Court decision is valid only when you say it is? How does that differ in your belief that something is unconstitutional because you say so?
That's just about right. I show you legal precedent and reasoning where several courts say Lincoln CHANGED our for of government, and your reply is:
'How does that differ in your belief that something is unconstitutional because you say so?'
My reply doesn't 'differ' one whit, it AFFIRMS my assertion. You totally ignore LEGAL determinations by the US Supreme Court(s) because you don't want to believe Lincoln committed an illegal act, broke his oath of office and caused the deaths of almost a million Americans just because he personally didn't agree with their right to live as they wished.
Guess denial ain't just a river in Egypt, huh?