Exactly, provided he followed treatment and probation guidelines 60 days is the time he would do and the rest of the sentence would apply if he did not, which was explained on O'Reilly and elsewhere at the time.
There are no revelations in this piece. They are making the bogus excuse that the 60 day sentence was not an outrage in itself. They are well aware that the determination of how well the probationer is doing is up the Judge and probation officers and that process in no way protects the public as well as incarceration of the offender. On the streets he could reoffend and get away with it. In prison there are no children available to molest.
The piece goes on to criticize the posters and bloggers who express their outrage over Judge Cashman. If an observer is not outraged by this decision they are the ones who are wrong. Apparently, Will Hunter is among them.
Maybe Will Hunter thinks raping children is okay.
He is certainly more concerned about the rehabilitation of the perpetrator and the career his enabler (the judge) than he is about the poor child victim.