Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: everyone

The vote in the Missouri case isn't a problem. He hadn't seen it before and therefore couldn't in good conscience reject it without a hearing.

But the pledge to provide a free vote to review death-penalty cases as a matter of courtesy, regardless of his own judgment, is terrible. One, it sets an awful precedent, however seemingly minor. The senators should be given no promises whatsoever. Now that they've been given a promise, it strengthens their ability and inclination to demand more promises of future nominess. Major political blunder by Alito. Two, it ignores the fact that there are four hard-left "justices" on the Court. If Alito is an automatic fifth vote to review death penalty cases, he is making it harder to carry out the death penalty by further entangling it in usually meritless litigation.


44 posted on 02/03/2006 1:17:58 PM PST by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: California Patriot
But the pledge to provide a free vote to review death-penalty cases as a matter of courtesy, regardless of his own judgment, is terrible.

It's also been standard procedure of the Supreme Court for decades.

Breathe.
134 posted on 02/03/2006 5:04:57 PM PST by Terpfen (72-25: The Democrats mounted a failibuster!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson