Skip to comments.
Protests Intensify Over Muhammad Drawings
AP on Yahoo ^
| 2/3/06
| Qassim Abdul-Zahra - ap
Posted on 02/03/2006 10:55:03 AM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last

Hundreds of Sudanese Muslims protest against the Danish publication of drawings of Islam's Prophet Muhammad, in the streets of Khartoum following Friday prayers, Friday, Feb. 3, 2006. The drawings have sparked a wide scale Islamic denunciation as well as angry demonstrations and calls to boycott Danish products. (AP Photo/Abd Raouf)
To: NormsRevenge

Pakistani Islamists from Jamiat Ulma-e-Pakistan group burn Danish, Norwegian and French flags during a rally in Lahore February 3, 2006. Muslim outrage spread through Asia on Friday over publication of cartoons in European newspapers depicting the Prophet Mohammad, but nowhere were there protests of any great size. REUTERS/Mohsin Raza
2
posted on
02/03/2006 10:56:00 AM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: NormsRevenge
I read this a short time ago. I personally think it's disgusting that the State Department is even hinting that there's some bit of fault with someone publishing a damn cartoon. Maybe, just maybe, we could blame the Muslims that have gotten all bent out of shape?
To: NormsRevenge
The State Department continues to be anti-American below the appointed level.
4
posted on
02/03/2006 10:56:51 AM PST
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: ncountylee
5
posted on
02/03/2006 10:57:36 AM PST
by
stuartcr
(Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
To: NormsRevenge
6
posted on
02/03/2006 10:57:39 AM PST
by
blues_guitarist
(Ez. 38 & 39 <--- It's closer than you think!)
To: NormsRevenge
..
but nowhere were there protests of any great size.
they snuck that in the photo caption yet what will be frontpage news and the first story on the news programs of , by and for the left? ;-)
7
posted on
02/03/2006 10:58:00 AM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: NormsRevenge
Don't these a**holes have jobs?
8
posted on
02/03/2006 10:58:01 AM PST
by
RexBeach
("There is no substitute for victory." -Douglas MacArthur)
To: NormsRevenge
"State Department press officer Janelle Hironimus said these rights must be coupled with press responsibility." genuinely retarded.
9
posted on
02/03/2006 10:58:09 AM PST
by
xcamel
(Exposing clandestine operations is treason. 13 knots make a noose.)
To: NormsRevenge
With this level of mentality, is it really any wonder that all of the poorest, most backwards nations in the world (except for Sierra Leone, human slavery capital of the world), are Islamic?
10
posted on
02/03/2006 10:58:23 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
To: NormsRevenge

A child cries as Islamic protestors pray outside the Danish embassy in London. Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen offered no apologies for cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed, deemed offensive by Muslims, but tried to defuse the crisis as Muslims across the world gathered for prayers.(AFP/Carl de Souza)
11
posted on
02/03/2006 10:58:58 AM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: stuartcr
Should have said:
The State Department continues to be pro-Arabist below the appointed level.
12
posted on
02/03/2006 10:59:22 AM PST
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
Disgusting. I'm very disapointed.
To: NormsRevenge
If it is state-sponsored art such as 'Pi^^ Chr*&t', it is a mere neutral societal statement, but if it somehow takes note of the aesthetics of islamic rage it is offensive. Bombhammed would be okay if it were state-sponsored. The press, of course, is an institution of the state, but don't let that confuse the issue.
15
posted on
02/03/2006 11:03:21 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
Foggy bottom strikes again. Someone remind me... what was their stance on Piss Christ?
16
posted on
02/03/2006 11:03:22 AM PST
by
oolatec
To: ncountylee
pro-Arabist below the appointed level
There is no way that the Department of State spokesman would have said this without the full approval of Secretary Rice.
17
posted on
02/03/2006 11:03:30 AM PST
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: xcamel
18
posted on
02/03/2006 11:03:38 AM PST
by
kokonut
To: xcamel
John Bolton should become Sec. of State so he could clean out the State Dept. like the job he's doing at the UN.
19
posted on
02/03/2006 11:04:21 AM PST
by
JMS
To: NormsRevenge
is it our turn to be wimps?
20
posted on
02/03/2006 11:04:49 AM PST
by
From One - Many
(Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson