Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Incident At Taco Bell Leads To Charges
Hartford Courant News Briefs ^ | February 3, 2006

Posted on 02/03/2006 5:53:50 AM PST by Blue Turtle

ENFIELD - A woman accused of using racial epithets while waiting for food at a Taco Bell drive-through window was arrested Wednesday.

Jennifer Farrelly, 19, of East Windsor, has been charged with ridicule on account of race, creed or color and second-degree breach of peace. Farrelly's boyfriend, Eric Satterlee, 22, of Ashford, was charged with breach of peace in the incident.

On Dec. 18, Farrelly and Satterlee became frustrated by the slow service at the Taco Bell restaurant on Brookside Place, according to an arrest warrant. Farrelly banged on the drive-through window and called the Taco Bell attendant, Jamelle Byrd, a racial epithet, according to the warrant. Satterlee allegedly cursed and banged on the window.

Farrelly denied using racial epithets when she was interviewed by police, saying Byrd caused the dispute by ridiculing her for parking her car far away from the drive-through window, the warrant states. Byrd's supervisor told police that Byrd should not have been working the drive-through because he had gotten into a similar incident with another customer, the warrant states.

Police Chief Carl J. Sferrazza said Byrd was not arrested in the incident.

(Excerpt) Read more at courant.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: connecticut; constitutionlist; donutwatch; fakehatecrimes; libertarians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last
To: Blue Turtle

If we had just one legitimate major political party in this country, then maybe the personal freedoms that us common citizens cherish might be safe. But the bozoes who call the shots in these two political parties we do have, think the only free speech issues worth fighting for revolve around contributions to political campaigns. No politician wants to defend the right of some jerk to call someone offensive names, but if a society is to remain free it has to be done.


81 posted on 02/03/2006 6:28:40 PM PST by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger; speedy; Joe 6-pack; LibertarianInExile; Rennes Templar

This is nacho usual type of complaint about Taco Bell; it borders on serious.


82 posted on 02/03/2006 6:31:50 PM PST by hispanarepublicana (Chuck Cooperstein is a tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dancusa
Enfield is not East Windsor or Ashford.

:-)
83 posted on 02/04/2006 7:28:11 AM PST by cgbg (MSM and Democratic treason--fifty years and counting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

And chances are that the libs will use the sex offender registry as a model example for a national "hate offender" registry...yep, use hate speech, you go to prison, have to register as a hate offender for the rest of your life, wear a GPS ankle bracelet for life, and be under lifetime probation.

The New America : Freedom For Far-Left Liberals, Slavery For Everybody Else


84 posted on 02/07/2006 12:05:49 AM PST by bigdcaldavis ("HYAHHHHHHH!!!!!!!" - Howard Dean; Xandros - Linux Made Easy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LambSlave

"any misdemenor (breach of peace) is elevated to felony if there is any component to the crime involving protected groups (which even includes the obese, so in PA if he had said, Hey Fat A&* hurry up with my order, it would still be a felony)"

So if a guy rejected a date from a girl because he thought she was too fat, he's automatically a felon.

Dear America : My allegiance to you is on the line. If you decide to go down the Western European path of socialism and criminalization of hate speech, I will decide to disavow my allegiance to you.


85 posted on 02/07/2006 12:10:55 AM PST by bigdcaldavis ("HYAHHHHHHH!!!!!!!" - Howard Dean; Xandros - Linux Made Easy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MajorityOfOne

"Calling the ACLU, Calling the ACLU -- hmmm, no answer."

Don't you know that the ACLU will only fight for the rights of the far-left? And don't get me started on the ACLU's stance on the forced implantation of microchips (they're actually in favor of it....as long as it's applied to all people).


86 posted on 02/07/2006 12:14:14 AM PST by bigdcaldavis ("HYAHHHHHHH!!!!!!!" - Howard Dean; Xandros - Linux Made Easy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Blue Turtle

87 posted on 02/07/2006 12:21:48 AM PST by wardaddy (Guns, God, Abortion is Murder, Private Property, Borders,My Culture, Break Islam....any questions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson