Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/03/2006 5:36:16 AM PST by new yorker 77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: new yorker 77

Wow!


2 posted on 02/03/2006 5:36:53 AM PST by WashingtonSource (Freedom is not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77; All

Worst economy ever...


3 posted on 02/03/2006 5:36:59 AM PST by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Check out this Reuter's headline:

"Jan jobless rate drops, job growth disappoints"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060203/bs_nm/economy_employment_dc


4 posted on 02/03/2006 5:37:33 AM PST by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

The democrats will say that more people have given up trying to find work. Don't you know this is the worst economy since the depression?

/sarcasm


5 posted on 02/03/2006 5:37:46 AM PST by PilloryHillary (Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Dims: NOT Bush's fault!


6 posted on 02/03/2006 5:37:59 AM PST by ConservativeGreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Damn McDonalds, employing all those people. Damn Bush economy!


7 posted on 02/03/2006 5:38:01 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

John Kerry's Hooverville dreams are being undermined.


8 posted on 02/03/2006 5:38:09 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Forecasters called for a higher number for today. Therefore, the MSM will LIE this report into a bad news story.


9 posted on 02/03/2006 5:38:16 AM PST by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Clinton could do better. Ask Tim Kaine.


12 posted on 02/03/2006 5:38:58 AM PST by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

It seems to me that the unemployment-inflation relationship has now been optimized.

Time to start working on the trade imbalance


13 posted on 02/03/2006 5:44:01 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

WOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!


16 posted on 02/03/2006 5:46:01 AM PST by txrangerette ("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

should be Breaking, we need to cheer this good economic news as Bush travels and makes speeches on the same subject.


17 posted on 02/03/2006 5:47:53 AM PST by RobFromGa (In decline, the Old Media gets more shrill, thrashing about like a dinosaur caught in the tar pits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

U.S. Economy Adds 193,000 Jobs in Jan.; Unemployment Rate at 4.7%

Friday, February 03, 2006



WASHINGTON — U.S. employers added a smaller-than-forecast 193,000 new jobs in January but job growth in each of the five prior months was pushed up as part of a broader annual revision of the Labor Department's statistics collection, a government report on Friday showed.

The monthly report showed the January unemployment rate dropped to a 4-1/2-year low 4.7 percent from 4.9 percent in December. The last time the rate was lower was in July 2001 when it was at 4.6 percent.

Economists had forecast that 240,000 new jobs would be created in January and that the unemployment rate would be unchanged at 4.9 percent.

Average hourly earnings rose to $16.41 in January from $16.34 in December. In the 12 months through January, earnings have risen by 3.3 percent, the largest for any 12-month period in nearly three years, since February 2003. The wage data is likely to fan concerns that steady job growth is pushing up demands for wage rises and that could help foster broader inflation.

Previously, the department said 108,000 jobs were created in December but it pushed that up to 140,000 and it said that, in November, 354,000 jobs were created rather than the 305,000 it reported a month ago.


18 posted on 02/03/2006 5:50:33 AM PST by RobFromGa (In decline, the Old Media gets more shrill, thrashing about like a dinosaur caught in the tar pits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

We're DOOOOOOOMED!


19 posted on 02/03/2006 5:50:51 AM PST by kevkrom ("...no one has ever successfully waged a war against stupidity" - Orson Scott Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

23 posted on 02/03/2006 5:52:07 AM PST by Lunatic Fringe (North Texas Solutions http://ntxsolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
MSM Headlines

Worker Productivity Plummets, Wage Inflation Signals Seen
Worst Economy in 50 years

Unemployment at 4.7% with 193000 new jobs created In January.

29 posted on 02/03/2006 6:02:11 AM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Bloomberg puts a more positive spin on their headline:

U.S. Economy Adds 193,000 Jobs; Unemployment Rate Drops to a Four-Year Low

American employers added 193,000 workers in January and the unemployment rate fell to 4.7 percent, the lowest since July 2001, as the U.S. economy strengthened and builders took advantage of warm weather to start projects...

http://www.bloomberg.com/


32 posted on 02/03/2006 6:07:47 AM PST by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Definitely Bush's Fault!


33 posted on 02/03/2006 6:09:48 AM PST by JimWforBush (3 things I won't discuss...Politics, Religion and The Great Pumpkin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Ok - so has BLS and DOL changed the way they seasonally adjust the numbers lately?

It had been the first two reports for a month were preliminary, so each month would be revised a total of two times. In a growing economy, it hadn't been unusual to see upward revisions the first time, then slightly downward the next.

Now for this report, nov-dec growth was revised upward by 32k, oct-nov was revised downward by 49k, but they've gone back and revised the september and october job numbers *downward* from their supposed final numbers of last month. More specifically, they moved the october report down 178k and september down 190k.

Not trying to throw doom and gloom, but I've never seen them do this before. Maybe I've never noticed this before and its just my own oversight... :)


36 posted on 02/03/2006 6:13:21 AM PST by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Yes, but are they "good" jobs?

Whatever happened to that talking point?


37 posted on 02/03/2006 6:14:27 AM PST by mikemc282002 (Don't Worry, We Have Tom Brady - All Your Super Bowls Are Belong To Us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson