Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unemployment rate dropped to 4.7% in January - 193,000 New Jobs
February 3, 2006

Posted on 02/03/2006 5:36:15 AM PST by new yorker 77

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241 next last
To: new yorker 77

This will either be reported as bad news or not reported at all in the MSM.


61 posted on 02/03/2006 7:04:14 AM PST by Personal Responsibility (Amnesia is a train of thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilloryHillary

When it comes to Republicans.


62 posted on 02/03/2006 7:05:45 AM PST by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: eraser2005
"Now for this report, nov-dec growth was revised upward by 32k, oct-nov was revised downward by 49k, but they've gone back and revised the september and october job numbers *downward* from their supposed final numbers of last month.

I get a different result using my data source of Dow Jones Newswires.

The employment report issued today revised the Dec jobs number upward +32k and revised the Nov jobs number upward +49k. The total revision upward in today's report for Nov-Dec was +81k. I see nothing about downward revisions in today's report

Do you have a link for your data source?

63 posted on 02/03/2006 7:08:58 AM PST by Unmarked Package
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
A few months of that and Bernanke might start taking 50 basis points a shot. They say he is a stickler, and will have strict inflation targets.

You're probably right, but the tragedy is that job growth isn't inflationary. Most likely the Federal Reserve will reward America's success with a recession as they always do.

64 posted on 02/03/2006 7:09:20 AM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Watch the left freak out as the deficit falls this year. The tax cuts are helping the American people create jobs and thus a greater tax base. They are indeed revenue generators. If the republicans in congress can reduce the rate of growth in spending, the deficit will be a lot lower than current projections


65 posted on 02/03/2006 7:09:55 AM PST by jimfrommaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

You would have thought people might have noticed that when we added 45 million new jobs between 1980 and 2000, and experienced the longest continued growth, characterized by low inflation in our nation's history.


66 posted on 02/03/2006 7:15:19 AM PST by RWR8189 (George Allen for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Unmarked Package
Sorry - I corrected in a later post - oct-nov growth was revised upward by 49k, not downward... but if you compare numbers in table b-1 of last month's report with this month's report you'll see the significant downward revision I'm referring to (a change of 368,000)...
67 posted on 02/03/2006 7:16:58 AM PST by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

And yet, because it is is being screamed as less than predicted, the stock market is falling like a rock! 4.7 unemployment and the media screams we have a bad economy. And the spineless on wall street cave and fold.


68 posted on 02/03/2006 7:18:17 AM PST by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; Mase; expat_panama

hehe


69 posted on 02/03/2006 7:18:47 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

That's not why the stock market is dropping.

Investors are scared of inflation and more rate hikes.

If it had been the higher number that the street was predicting, the market would be down even more.


70 posted on 02/03/2006 7:19:42 AM PST by RWR8189 (George Allen for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

The White House did not comment on the disappointing economic news. The new unemployment numbers fell short of President Bush's projections for this quarter.


71 posted on 02/03/2006 7:22:12 AM PST by Cruz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
Sooooo... let me guess this straight... coupled with the 2 months being revised upward... That's an additional 274,000 jobs... The "forecast" was for 240,000.

Show me again where we underperformed expectations??? Unreal.

72 posted on 02/03/2006 7:24:28 AM PST by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Those numbers are reversed, it 7.4 % in Michigan(maybe more).

I wonder if have a RAT Governor and all these socialst unions plays a role in that?
73 posted on 02/03/2006 7:24:41 AM PST by Beagle8U (An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

Advanced economies are advanced precisely because labor is released from manufacturing and agriculture to the service sector. Only in hand-to-mouth economies are the majority of workers in those areas. Our productivity is so high it takes few workers to provide the material goods necessary for a good life.

If you don't believe services such as medical care, finance, education and government do not provide for a better life and a stronger economy I suggest you read a few economics texts.


74 posted on 02/03/2006 7:25:53 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: zert_28

You're right. Canada's been taken over by Bush Nazi's. Cuba is the place to be. Castro's a good man.


75 posted on 02/03/2006 7:27:48 AM PST by ALWAYSWELDING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jimfrommaine

I'm not sold on the tax cuts "creating" revenue yet - the cuts took 5 years to get revenues back to 2000 levels. Last year growth in revenue was the largest in many years, but a spike is not unusual coming out of a recession. There was even a spike coming out of the 91 recession about the same timeframe into the recovery of slightly lower magnitude, even though there were tax hikes at that time.

That's not to say lower taxes aren't good - but its a bad idea to lower taxes without keeping spending in line (something the GOP can't seem to do). Otherwise you'll get 33% annual growth in interest payments like we're seeing this year.

I agree - if they reduce the rate of growth in spending (preferably to below the rate of inflation), they'll lower the deficit. But with Katrina and Iraq spending, we're looking at an even larger deficit this year.

Bring back pay-go.


76 posted on 02/03/2006 7:31:08 AM PST by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Blame it on the unions - with a republican governor, things were just as bad....


77 posted on 02/03/2006 7:33:12 AM PST by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: eraser2005

We came out of the 91 recession due to lower interest rates, new construction due to hurricane damage, and a technology boom. All these things offset the Bush and Clinton tax increases. However one Clinton sued microsft, and the dot-coms destroyed the markets, there wasn't anything to keep the economy moving forward. Then 9/11 happened which made a mess of everything.
The tax cuts W offered were very modest in size. And yet they've helped to revive the economy. With bigger, more massive tax cuts, revenues will be much stronger. For the economy and the tax base will be much larger


78 posted on 02/03/2006 7:38:27 AM PST by jimfrommaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

Comment #79 Removed by Moderator

To: new yorker 77

It's the fault of outsourcing to china and india.

It's the fault of illegal immigration.

It's lincoln chaffee's fault.

It's Schwarzenner's fault.

It's Delay's fault.

It's globalization's fault.

It's free trade's fault.

It's Alito's fault.

It's Bush's fault.

It's McCain's fault.

It's the gang of 14's fault.

It's the fault of tax cuts.


80 posted on 02/03/2006 7:41:58 AM PST by staytrue (MOONBAT CONSERVATIVES are those who would rather lose to a liberal than support a moderate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson