Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: speekinout
Yes, that's close, but I also said that I wasn't strongly rejecting your advocacy of turning up the heat on employers. I think it could still be done in the context of a guest-worker program unavailable to illegals. The way it could work would be to enact the program, and at the same time (or sooner) conduct a strong show of force along the border, and then about six months later (to give employers time to start replacing their workers with legal ones), start putting the squeeze on the employers. First target the ones who are dragging their feet the most, so that they all have an incentive to pick up the pace.
144 posted on 02/13/2006 8:55:30 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
The way it could work would be to enact the program, and at the same time (or sooner) conduct a strong show of force along the border, and then about six months later (to give employers time to start replacing their workers with legal ones), start putting the squeeze on the employers.

And that would give illegal immigrants a 6 month "window" to get here. And they would come in droves.

Better would be to have a program that starts with the employers. Set up a guest worker application process, and tell the employers that they have 2 weeks to either sponsor their illegal employees for guest worker status, or fire them and hire legal workers.
There won't need to be "a strong show of force" at the border.

145 posted on 02/14/2006 2:53:02 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson