Posted on 02/02/2006 12:20:28 PM PST by presidio9
I'm a Conservative and a main street Republican as opposed to a Wall Street Republican. I've heard Swann interviewed and I don't know what he stands for or why he's running. Sure, Reagan had no experience in government before he ran for governor of California, but he spent years writing on issues of national and international importance; he traveled across the country for G.E. and gave political and economic speeches; he had strong political beliefs while he was an actor. Supposedly, it was one of the reasons Jane Wyman grew tired of him.
What is Swann? An attractive, personable celebrity who's a football hero in Pittsburgh. That's about it. Rendell is an experienced pol, a smart lawyer, a former prosecutor. Think Swann can stand up to him in a tough debate? He'll eat Swann alive.
Isn't anybody bothered that we don't know squat about Swann's political philosophy? Haven't we learned anything about the Harriet Miers flap? What kind of mandate would he have if he won, if voters have no idea what they're voting for? The only way to get any promises from him would be in the Republican primary. Once he wins that, it's too late as he'll have plenty of room to go left to beat Rendell as few Repubs will vote for Rendell over Swann. If he wins, THAT leftist move would become his mandate!
I think you underestimate Swann and don't give him enough credits. I also think Fast Eddie would be a fool to debate him. It would be a Nixon/Kennedy redux. Fast Eddie has a terrible voice and spit balls up and flies out the corner of his mouth when he talks. It's disgusting. Everyone is so ticked off at him that seeing his face would remind them of how badly they want him out. Swann is very telegenic and polished speaking off the cuff from his commentator experience.
Better a football player than another lawyer.
?n?����?[?�ed at his website or heard him on national media he has talked of his philosophy and positions. In Englandd people have 3 short months to get to know a candidate before elections. PA voters have plenty of time to see what Swann is all about.
sorry- don't know what happened there.
i agree with what youre saying. i think that most pennsylvanians would vote for a black man. the poster said that poeple he knew would never vote for a black man. well, rendell is jewish and id bet that if they are racist enough not to vote for swann, they wont for rendell either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.