Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jmc813

Some how I find it hard to belive that having a House Majority leader who appeared to be beholden to McCain for winning the Leadership job would be in Conservatives best intrest. But, Pence did give the nod to Shadegg, and that carries a lot more weight then McCain's goofing, so maybe you are correct. Guess we are going to find out.


129 posted on 02/02/2006 11:15:39 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("Vote Democrat-We are the party of reactionary inertia".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie

The deal with McCain is that he does work to stop conservative gains in many critical areas, but he wants the recommendations of "powerful" conservative voices when he runs. He's trying to bridge connections. It's why he "endorsed" Blackwell in Ohio. Blackwell wins Ohio he'll be an influential force in national politics in '08. Though he waited to endorse Blackwell until it was clear he was the first choice.

Endorsing Shadegg doesn't necessarily mean a thing about Shadegg, other than McCain wants more buddies to add to the list of those that "endorse" him to primary voters.

Whereas McCain endorsing Cameron, new leader of Tories in britain, IS an example of McCain trying to push his RINO agenda forward overseas.


208 posted on 02/02/2006 11:31:15 AM PST by Soul Seeker (Mr. President: It is now time to turn over the money changers' tables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson