Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: devane617

Good point. I was opposed to this when the policy was adopted by the feds during the Clinton Administration. The fees the feds charge are outrageous.

Besides this is supposed to be PUBLIC lands, purchased by, and maintained with public tax money. Basically the law states they can charge those who photograph/film for commercial purposes, but the charge is so steep it would keep most smalltime writers/photograhers from doing so.


21 posted on 02/02/2006 7:52:00 AM PST by girlangler (I'd rather be fishing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: girlangler

I can see a problem with allowing a huge film crew filming a movie to tramp over the land while leaving a mess. However, Mr Csonka's show, I would guess, has a very small film crew, maybe one guy. Besides, what the heck is wrong with taking pictures?


27 posted on 02/02/2006 7:55:28 AM PST by devane617 (An Alley-Cat mind is a terrible thing to waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson