Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pageonetoo

I would say that Wuli has raised a solid argument backed by some solid points.

Do you have a reasonable counter-argument backed by reasonable counter-points, or are you going to play the blind faith role of my President (and his administation) right or wrong?


9 posted on 02/02/2006 6:29:42 AM PST by Camerican (It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing - Macbeth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Camerican

Why would Condi admit to an interest in running for President now? Why give the MSM & Dems an extra year or two to bash you? Her ability to raise money is not in question. If and when she does run those WHITE Republicans will shower the campaign with money and will rise up in support in an effort to drive a stake through the heart of the Democrat Racial Lies.


14 posted on 02/02/2006 6:33:38 AM PST by stocksthatgoup (http://www.busateripens.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Camerican

Wuli didn't make a good point.

A single quote, taken out of context, used to draw conclusions about the preparedness and ability of a woman who has done a pretty good job of taking control of a run away State Department.

It isn't her competence that makes Condi Rice a questionable Presidential candidate. She's very competent. It is her lack of experience in running a campaign. She has so far gained all of her positions through her competence and ability. Election campaigns are a different beast entirely, where ability and competence is secondary to showmanship and charisma.


15 posted on 02/02/2006 6:38:21 AM PST by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Camerican; Wuli
...are you going to play the blind faith role of my President (and his administation) right or wrong?

First, if you know my record, I am not a Bushbot. I am one of his strongest critics on many different policies (immigration, tax, drugs for seniors, and too many more to list). But, all of Wuli's posits are based on ASSUMPTIONS, not facts. He only uses facts to lay his foundation, and then straw-mans her into them.

Ms. Rice is the former security advisor to the Prez. She has facts and theories available to her on a daily basis, and has had them for a number of years, now. Some things are said in public to give an impression. It is called propaganda.

If you look at the overall responses, and read between the lines, I believe you will see her as anything but ignorant. Instead, I think you may think of a fox and a hen, with the roles reversed.

I would sure vote for her, before I would vote for McCain or other pseudo-pubbies...


17 posted on 02/02/2006 6:43:40 AM PST by pageonetoo (FReepmail me for bargain cruises! Bonded Agency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Camerican
I would say that Wuli has raised a solid argument backed by some solid points. Do you have a reasonable counter-argument backed by reasonable counter-points, or are you going to play the blind faith role of my President (and his administation) right or wrong?

First Wuli stated his opinion and furnish no proof for that opinion other than what he thinks. My first argument would be that if you are of the opinion Condi did not see it coming and that is disqualification for the presidency then who are the politicians running for president that saw it coming and on that basis should be elected.

75 posted on 02/02/2006 9:22:14 AM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson