Posted on 02/02/2006 6:11:22 AM PST by areafiftyone
The president's State of the Union Address will be little noted and not long remembered. There was a sense that he was talking at, not to, the country. He asserted more than he persuaded, and he chose to redeclare his beliefs rather than argue for them in any depth. If you believe, as he does, that the No. 1 priority for the American government at this point in history is to lead an international movement for political democracy, and if you believe, as he truly seems to, that political democracy is in and of itself a certain bringer of world-wide peace, than this speech was for you. If not, not. It went through a reported 30 drafts, was touched by many hands, and seemed it. Not precisely a pudding without a theme, but a thin porridge.
It was the first State of the Union Mr. Bush has given in which Congress seemed utterly pre-9/11 in terms of battle lines drawn. Exactly half the chamber repeatedly leapt to its feet to applaud this banality or that. The other half remained resolutely glued to its widely cushioned seats. It seemed a metaphor for the Democratic Party: We don't know where to stand or what to stand for, and in fact we're not good at standing for anything anyway, but at least we know we can't stand Republicans.
There was only one unforgettable moment, and that was in a cutaway shot, of Hillary Clinton, who simply must do something about her face. When the president joked that two people his father loves are turning 60 this year, himself and Bill Clinton--why does he think constant references to that relationship work for him?--it was Mrs. Clinton's job to look mildly amused, or pleasant, or relatively friendly, or nonhostile.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
just think the War in Iraq is going well and you aren't a true conservative according to him.
But then again, isn't claiming to be a "true conservative" the same as talking about taking pride in telling people how often you go to church???
I like Peggy. I think though she's overly concerned with style when it comes to presidential speeches.
Kind of harsh regarding Peggy. She's a talented writer even though I do not always agree with her point of view. I thought the main thrust of the article was the implosion of the Democratic Party. Also, I think W was just being polite when he referred to Clinton. Do we have to be zinging each other all the time? Who's got the energy?
PS As a 55 year old male I think Peggy's still "hot." So there -).
I remember cringing when I felt that tone coming out of her writing.
#####
And the funny (sad) thing about Noonan's Elitism - she comes from a very traditional middle middle class background. She has risen to her Elite (in her own mind) status, and forgets her origins.
I think Bush does that to people that have stabbed him in the back....saying publicly how great they have been and praying that they will change.
What WILL be remembered is the Democrats actions and how AWFUL they acted!!
Hmmmmm........good point. Bragging incessantly about one's conservative credentials in order to belittle others smacks of the same kind of hypocrisy.
From her Senate website: ----
CLINTON, Hillary Rodham, (1947 - )
Senate Years of Service: 2001-
Party: Democrat
CLINTON, Hillary Rodham, (wife of President William Jefferson Clinton), a Senator from New York; born on October 26, 1947, in Chicago, Illinois; attended public school in Park Ridge, Illinois; graduated Wellesley College, BA 1969; graduated Yale Law School, JD 1973; attorney; counsel, impeachment inquiry staff, House Judiciary Committee 1974; First Lady of Arkansas 1983-1993; First Lady of the United States 1993-2001; elected to the United States Senate for term ending January 3, 2007.
I think you're right.
I like that paragraph, too. "Dull and sated cynicism" captures that snooty look from Hillary perfectly.
Not agreeing with them???
yep and you can see that with every post, Tread MUST throw around how he is a "TRUE" conservative.
*Snort*
You and your type believe that cheering all things Republican is somehow good for the nation...
Don't like it? Elect somebody of YOUR chosing.
You and your type are doing just as much damage to this country as any liberal I've ever seen; your constant negativism and out and out contortion of facts makes you not one bit better than Cindy Sheehan and the rest of the liars.
You're the TYPE that can actually get people elected to positions where they CAN make a difference in the future of this country.
You know, THAT type.
My grandmother use to say if you have to TELL people who you ARE, you probably AREN'T.
Spreading democracy is the best way to ensure this.
The speech was great.........strong, bold, in your face at the Dems.
####
Peggy reminds me of an English teacher who can't see past the form of the assignment to the impact of the student's work.
President Bush (and his speech-writing staff) know how to put concepts into language that he is comfortable using, and that will have a desired effect on its audience. Knowing that the Dems wanted to be demonstrative, he gave them red meat. Every reaction by them will be useful in future negotiations and campaign ads.
uh, Peggy? It would be "then" as in "then this speech was for you". How many hands touched YOUR rant? eesh. "and seemed it"? Just plain bad writing IMHO, all Bush bashing aside.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.