I sure don't see a conclusion in my statement. Can you enlighten me?
Well, you said...
"I don't know of a way to justify this vote on federalist or originalist grounds."
Your conclusion is that, on the face of it, this decision is not justified on federalist or originalist grounds. So I'm wondering how you came to the conclusion that this decision was not justified on federalist or originalist grounds, based on the facts of the case, that is.