Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vaquero
he gets this cold on the day he takes the oath and you expect him to have a man put to death without reviewing.

Should have recused on that basis. Would have been 5-3. Bad judgement in acting on it, imho.

35 posted on 02/02/2006 6:22:30 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: montag813

recusing would have been the same as voting yes. Obviously it was important enough to him to determine the life or death of this individual.

His action does NOT stop the execution, it just alows the justices time to review the evidence before making a final decision.


53 posted on 02/02/2006 6:29:10 AM PST by Vaquero (time again for the Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson