Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv
It is a challenge to the constitutionality of lethal injection.

And is the same challenge that the Supreme Court allowed to go ahead in Florida a week ago. Allowing this challenge to go forward will allow the Supreme Court a choice on which case to take and make the ultimate ruling on. It is at that point where the rubber meets the road.

83 posted on 02/02/2006 5:39:47 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Always Right

I don't disagree with you. All I want is for people to stop mischaracterizing the circumstances of the case and of Alito's participation. It's not as if any of this is going to change what kind of justice Alito is going to be. He will be what he will be so what's up with all this strained rhetoric?

The undeniable fact of the matter is that the liberals voted one way, the conservatives voted another way, and Alito voted with the liberals, and it sure as hell wasn't because he needs to "get up to speed" or whatever such nonsense. What that all means in the long run is anyone's guess.


85 posted on 02/02/2006 5:42:52 AM PST by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: Always Right

BTW, one thing that's worth noting about Alito is that reportedly, unlike many judges, he does not have his clerks review death penalty appeals. He reviews them himself. I personally think that's very commendable. It does suggest that he has a great appreciation for the gravity of capital punishment. What more it means, who knows?


92 posted on 02/02/2006 5:52:07 AM PST by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson