I am sorry, but I am not buying this garbage. I want to know why Fitz brought charges against Libby, especially if he knows that there was a problem with email archives? If Fitz believes that he did not have all of the facts, how could he, in good conscience, bring charges against someone? Perhaps the missing emails will exonerate Libby?
Fitz is playing a little game here. The Dems demanded someone's head on a platter and Fitz obliged them. Now when the defense is asking for the evidence, suddenly, Fitz cannot find it. Fitz sure found plenty of evidence to charge Libby, now where did that evidence go? Fitz has decided to blame an email problem, for not turning over all of the evidence.
"We are aware of no evidence pertinent to the charges against defendant Libby which has been destroyed," Fitzgerald wrote in a letter to the defense team.