If he hadn't reviewed the case, then he SHOULD have abstained, not voted the same way as Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Get real.
Exactly. There may be nothing wrong here, but it sure raises some questions. If the libs have managed to get another stealth leftist on the Supreme Court right under our very noses, it'll be one of the most stunning political defeats ever. I'll wait and see before jumping to conclusions, but I'm concerned.
What? You can't "abstain" from giving yourself time to look over a case.