Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gooper
With regard to the health of the mother issue, I agree that it's very uncommon. I'm sticking to my guns that the example mentioned above is a good reason to keep reasonable protections for mom in the law. Not the recommendations that Pelosi, et al made, but reasonable protections.

Your 'reasonable protections' are anything but reasonable. They are a loophole that is so big you could drive a truck through it....in fact, the existence of that loophole would allow all current abortions to take place.

32 posted on 02/01/2006 10:39:55 PM PST by EternalVigilance (www.usbordersecurity.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

You don't even know what "reasonable protections" I've suggested. I know this, because I haven't enumerated any of them -- frankly, I haven't even considered what they should be other than to say that there should be protections in cases where mom's life is in danger. All I've said is that the stuff Pelosi recommended goes way too far.


34 posted on 02/01/2006 10:45:12 PM PST by gooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson