1 posted on
02/01/2006 8:04:45 PM PST by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Out of all the partial birth abortions they've done, I'll bet the # where the "mother" was actually in any danger is ZERO.
2 posted on
02/01/2006 8:07:56 PM PST by
Slump Tester
( What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
To: neverdem
How is this unconstitutional? I want an esplanaton Lucy. Cite the paragraph in the Constitution that protects crotches. Must be another one of those inferred meanings.
4 posted on
02/01/2006 8:10:25 PM PST by
satchmodog9
(Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
To: neverdem
It is time for a Constitutional Amendment to end abortion. I am so sick of judges basing insane abortion decisions on "settled" abortion law. Roe vs Wade is a farce, it either needs to be overturned or a constitutional amendment.
To: neverdem
barred by the courts, is unconstitutional because it does not include an exception when the health of a pregnant woman is at riskIt also does not include exceptions for your pet kangaroo's malaria, or if the carburetor on your vintage Chevy SuperSport isn't set to optimize the fuel/air mixture. If you have figured out that none of these has any impact on the health of the mother, you will understand that the caveat is merely a smokescreen.
6 posted on
02/01/2006 8:10:37 PM PST by
TruthShallSetYouFree
(Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
To: neverdem
Two federal appeals courts yesterday upheld rulings that the Partial Birth Abortion Act, passed by Congress in 2003 but barred by the courts, is unconstitutional because it does not include an exception when the health of a pregnant woman is at risk. If these judges want to be legislators so badly, they need to resign from the bench and run for Congress...'cause they're destroying the republic!
To: neverdem
I will die happy if I know this curse of late-term abortion (and for that matter, all abortion) has been expunged from American society. I'm not very optimistic, since we can't even build a solid fence between the USA @ Mexico. We can build
745 abortion clinics, but no secured border.
11 posted on
02/01/2006 8:15:16 PM PST by
Number57
(Badly worded, but heart-felt)
To: neverdem
Two federal appeals courts yesterday upheld rulings that the Partial Birth Abortion Act, passed by Congress in 2003 but barred by the courts, is unconstitutional because it does not include an exception when the health of a pregnant woman is at risk. Ummm .. I thought it did include an exception when the health of a pregnant woman is at risk???
17 posted on
02/01/2006 8:25:13 PM PST by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: neverdem
If a guy has a "part" of himself inside a woman, can we kill him? This is the rationale for PBA.
24 posted on
02/01/2006 8:54:57 PM PST by
msnimje
(SAMMY for SANDY --- THAT IS WHAT I CALL A GOOD TRADE!!!)
To: neverdem
Assuming Alito joins the conservative, the law should be upheld by the SCOTUS. Kennedy supports Roe, but I think he also supports reasonable restrictions such as the PBA ban.
To: neverdem
People want the life of the mother to be protected. The abortionists want a "health" exemption because the word health can be expanded to mean anything, including "mental health" which can include:"I want to abort my child because I feel like it and I'll be happier once it's aborted. Since I'll be happier, I'll be in better mental health!"
To: neverdem
FR: ALl abortion, all the time!
38 posted on
02/02/2006 12:12:51 AM PST by
MonroeDNA
(Look for the union label--on the bat crashing through your windshield!)
To: neverdem
Apply the same logic to death row and you can suck the brains out of them as long as at least 1 foot is within the prison.
42 posted on
02/02/2006 3:53:00 AM PST by
pas
To: neverdem
I have a different question. Where does the Constitution empower the Congress to regulate abortions? Did they use the Commerce Clause? If that was the rationale, then the law should be invalidated, but not for the reasons presented by NARAL.
49 posted on
02/02/2006 10:42:14 AM PST by
Tarkin
(Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito...one more to go)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson