[FreedomNeocon]

Well the science is based on the idea of gravity.

The idea that the 'gravity' effect we have defined as coming from a 'mass' of objects is the SAME force that holds an atoms together as their 3 distinct parts.

The sumbling block has been that the force that holds atoms together ('weak' nuclear force, I think) attenuates MUCH faster than the 'gravity' ('strong' nuclear force).

That is it drops off faster than 1/2r^2 by many factors of 10.

This was why Einstien said he could not rectify his 'unified field theory' and gave up on it calling it his biggest blunder.

Anyway, the 'new' science basically says that it is the SAME force. They say at the 'quantum' level, at the center of an atom, the mass/gravity effect is strong enough, that in its perspective it warps space time, and thus makes it SEEM that the 'weak' electromagnetic force drops off so much faster viewing from our space-time perspective.

You can prove alot of that (atmoic clocks WILL move faster at higher altitudes further from Earth's "gravitational" field) and all.

Anyway... interesting stuff.

[no-to-illegals]

I saw the sub today being tested for magnetic propulsion via no moving parts simply sea water to set up the magnetic field to propel the sub test.

fascinating stuff....distortion field would then need to be directed, towards a stronger energy field to generate momentum. I'm certain there are 10s of millions, 100s of millions, nearly 10s of billions of people smarter than I am. I simply wish one of us would solve the momentum, steering, decreasing and increasing the momentum questions. Then there may be a material capable of withstanding the friction from acceleration, normal flight, to deceleration.